-BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-
The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
[The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
U.S. Embassy Workers
Link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html
*
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:16:28PM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi there,
> Is there a way to find out the below mentioned
> performance metrics.
>
>1. Measure Nginx webserver performance for both http and https traffic.
>2. Measure system resources like CPU, Memory (RAM) and Network ba
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:16 PM Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running nginx version: nginx/1.16.1 on CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003
> (Core) and have hosted my website on nginx for both http (port 80) and
> https (port 443) traffic. Is there a way to find out the below mentioned
> performa
Hi,
I am running nginx version: nginx/1.16.1 on CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003
(Core) and have hosted my website on nginx for both http (port 80) and
https (port 443) traffic. Is there a way to find out the below mentioned
performance metrics.
1. Measure Nginx webserver performance for both htt
Stop sending me savages
-Original Message-
From:
Sent: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:42:45 +0430
To: 7149144...@txt.att.net
Subject: Testing with number of connections
>Hi,
>I have compiled 1.14.2 from source and for some binary analysis, I want to
>measure the response t
Stop
-Original Message-
From:
Sent: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 21:30:30 + (UTC)
To: 7149144...@txt.att.net
Subject: RE: Testing with number of connections
>Stop sending me savages
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
> Sent: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:42:45 +0430
Messages I'm going to report
-Original Message-
From:
Sent: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 16:42:45 +0430
To: 7149144...@txt.att.net
Subject: Testing with number of connections
>Hi,
>I have compiled 1.14.2 from source and for some binary analysis, I want to
>measure the respo
> I have compiled 1.14.2 from source and for some binary analysis, I want to
> measure the response time under multiple connections, e.g. 1000 tcp
> connections. I am talking about sbin/nginx file.
> I didn't find a clear document on that. Does anybody know?
ab (apache bench)
siege
httperf
It's n
Hi,
I have compiled 1.14.2 from source and for some binary analysis, I want to
measure the response time under multiple connections, e.g. 1000 tcp
connections. I am talking about sbin/nginx file.
I didn't find a clear document on that. Does anybody know?
Regards,
Mahmood
__
In the past I have used "siege". I have grep the access.log for 200
Status code and create a list. This list I used for input in siege to
have a very close realistic stress test.
Best Regards
On 28.01.20 01:41, James Read wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know of a way to stress test a nginx server?
wrk is our go-to:
https://github.com/wg/wrk
Really any http load tester (ab, httperf, etc) should suffice
> On Jan 27, 2020, at 4:41 PM, James Read wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know of a way to stress test a nginx server? For example an epoll
> based web crawler that can make c10k con
Hi,
does anyone know of a way to stress test a nginx server? For example an
epoll based web crawler that can make c10k connections with the web server?
Thanks,
James Read
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/n
Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> > [...]
>
> [...]
>
> Upgrade to nginx 1.15.3+, this problem is expected to be addressed by
> this commit:
>
> http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/7ad0f4ace359
>
> Alternatively, you can modify (and/or disable via the OPEN
Hello!
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:17:39PM -0500, kmansoft wrote:
> Cross posting from https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/481963, this
> seems to be the better place to ask.
>
> ---
>
> Just updated Debian from "stable" 9.* to "testing" 10.*.
&g
Cross posting from https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/481963, this
seems to be the better place to ask.
---
Just updated Debian from "stable" 9.* to "testing" 10.*.
Have nginx 1.14 - used to come from "stable backports" now included in
Debian itself.
S
Hello,
We've just published the official packages for the 1.9.13 release and
two more dynamic module packages were added on all supported platforms:
- perl, nginx-module-perl
- njs, nginx-module-njs
Enjoy,
On 24/02/2016 22:08, Sergey Budnevitch wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Previously we built
> On 25 Feb 2016, at 20:57, B.R. wrote:
>
> Hello Sergey,
>
> Great news! :o)
> Would it possible to add a file in some conf.d containing the load_module
> directive so a package management system could automatically configure nginx
> to automatically load the module on the next reload?
It h
Hello Sergey,
Great news! :o)
Would it possible to add a file in some conf.d containing the load_module
directive so a package management system could automatically configure
nginx to automatically load the module on the next reload?
That is standard practice for some other technologies.
---
*B. R
Hello.
Previously we built nginx with all modules, except those that required
extra libraries. With dynamic modules it is possible to build them as
the separate packages and nginx main package will not have extra
dependences.
For nginx 1.9.12 we build additional packages with xslt, image-
Thanks!
I will use map and test it out.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,262024,262037#msg-262037
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
maps are a good way of conditionally setting variables' value.
---
*B. R.*
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Francis Daly wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:33:40PM -0400, rpriyana wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> > location / {
> > set $unsafe 0;
> > if ($ssl_protocol = TLSv1) {
> >
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:33:40PM -0400, rpriyana wrote:
Hi there,
> location / {
> set $unsafe 0;
> if ($ssl_protocol = TLSv1) {
> set $unsafe 1;
> }
> proxy_intercept_errors on;
> proxy_read_timeout 90;
> try_files $uri $uri/index.html @pr
I am on nginx 1.9.4
One of my https site cannot be accessed by IE8 in XP and some IE in Win 7
(getting 404).
It seems nginx do the try_files locally and gave up, not going for @proxy.
Works fine with other browser.
I narrowed it down to this sample config
# sample config that has issue #
What is performance testing?what is the importance of it?Can a
functional tester can do performance testing?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Please disregard this post, the error has been identified.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,257421,257422#msg-257422
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
This is a new install of 1.6.2 on linux dedi (centOS). I have the following
in my nginx.conf file:
fastcgi_cache_path /dev/nginx-cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=WORDPRESS:10m
max_size=1024m inactive=60m;
When testing the configurations (nginx -t), I get the following error
message:
nginx: [emerg
maybe switch to using Wordpress Super Cache ? handled blitz.io 8000 user
stress test fine with Nginx 1.7.7, PHP-FPM 7.0.0-dev, MariaDB 10.0.x and
CentOS 7.0 = 237 million hits/day on 2GB DigitalOcean KVM VPS server
http://wordpress7.centminmod.com/74/wordpress-super-cache-benchmarks-blitz-io-load-t
Thanks for all the help guys, I will regenerate this key with 2048 and see
how that goes. Still think the CPU usage is too high, but I will keep trying
to optimize my settings.
Have a nice day all =)
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,255158,255187#msg-255187
_
Hello!
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 09:21:49AM -0500, julianfernandes wrote:
> Ok, just tested it with HTTP instead of HTTPS and while it did reach 100% of
> CPU usage from time to time, the average load was 50% and the Blitz.io test
> was a lot better:
> - 33,086 HITS WITH 29 ERRORS & 2,344 TIMEOUTS
julianfernandes Wrote:
---
> Why would SSL perform so badly? I generated the key with 4096 instead
> of 2048, but I don't believe that would affect CPU usage this much.
http://bench.cr.yp.to/results-encrypt.html
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://f
Ok, just tested it with HTTP instead of HTTPS and while it did reach 100% of
CPU usage from time to time, the average load was 50% and the Blitz.io test
was a lot better:
- 33,086 HITS WITH 29 ERRORS & 2,344 TIMEOUTS
Why would SSL perform so badly? I generated the key with 4096 instead of
2048, bu
/nginx/conf.d/includes/caching.inc -
> > http://paste.ubuntu.com/9236353/
> > - /etc/nginx/conf.d/includes/locations.inc -
> > http://paste.ubuntu.com/9236366/
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > :)
> >
> > Posted at Nginx Forum:
> http://fo
Hi,
Can you provide the mailing list with the output of 'nginx -V' and a
debug log when a worker process is pegged at 100%. See
http://nginx.org/en/docs/debugging_log.html for info on debug logs.
I also wonder why your supplied config has the following:
limit_req_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=on
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:15 AM, julianfernandes wrote:
> Running Blitz.io on it the server is getting absolutely murdered by the
> NGINX worker processes, which each one using 100% CPU according to top and
> htop.
100% CPU usage problems are usually trivial (and also fun) to solve
with t
mex Wrote:
---
> hi,
>
>
> does you errorlog tells you something?
Nothing at all, I'm afraid. It have an error for OCSP stappling, however
disabling it doesn't fix the issue, so I believe that isn't it.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.ng
hi,
does you errorlog tells you something?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,255158,255162#msg-255162
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
I'm facing an issue here and after six days of looking around I decided to
ask for some help here, after all a million heads can think a lot better
than one.
I have a Ubuntu 14.04 server setup with NGINX, HHVM, PHP5-FPM (as a backup),
Percona MySQL, Memcached (which will be replaced by Redis). I h
I add an extra header, just for those who don't understand spdy...
add_header Alternate-Protocol "443:npn-spdy/3.1";
and specifically set up ssl protocols/ciphers and ocsp stapling but I'd
suggest that it's a limitation of the benchmark that you're hitting.
Using something like webpaget
I need to evaluate if using spdy will be good for my website but i'm having
trouble setting everyting up. While using the chrome benchmark extension (1)
an error message stating that it was not possible to use spdy apeared. This
made me believe that there might be something wrong with my configurat
You must have used `service nginx reload` or `service nginx configtest`.
On Friday, February 21, 2014 10:36:01 AM Paul N. Pace wrote:
> It seems like way back in the olden days, when I restarted nginx ('sudo
> service nginx restart'), if there was a configuration issue in nginx.conf,
> I would get
It seems like way back in the olden days, when I restarted nginx ('sudo
service nginx restart'), if there was a configuration issue in nginx.conf,
I would get a warning telling me such and, IIRC, nginx would boot using the
last known valid configuration.
It doesn't seem to happen that way any more
And what were you up to with ab? Can you check both real quick?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,244110,244112#msg-244112
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
AB is not good enough for testing...
Use http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/weighttp/wiki
on debian-like install "libevent-dev"
AB didn't use multicore/thread..
With weighttp I was able to hit 100 000q/s
2013/10/25 youreright :
> I'm getting under 5000 requests per
I'm getting under 5000 requests per second hitting just the nginx welcome
page on a default configuration.
Any tips to improve this please?
setup is:
==
macbook pro retina 10.8.3
RoverMR:webserver rover$ nginx -v
nginx version: nginx/1.4.3
== Running ab test ==
RoverMR:webserver rover$ ab -n 10
44 matches
Mail list logo
