Re: RE: nginx proxy vs apache proxy

2013-06-19 Thread Jonathan Matthews
On 19 June 2013 14:19, solitaryr wrote: > Thanks, Lucas. We looked at the headers being passed back (that's what the > jsp was for). Even with http completely disabled and https only available, > they were still passed as http:80 by nGinx...but Apache passed them through. I don't understand wha

Re: RE: nginx proxy vs apache proxy

2013-06-19 Thread solitaryr
Thanks, Lucas. We looked at the headers being passed back (that's what the jsp was for). Even with http completely disabled and https only available, they were still passed as http:80 by nGinx...but Apache passed them through. We tried this on two separate environments. I looked at the ajp m

RE: nginx proxy vs apache proxy

2013-06-12 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, > Nginx responses show (regardless of how I try to connect): > > Scheme: http > Name: my.example.com > Port: 80 > [...] > proxy_set_header Host $http_host; > proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-By $server_addr:$server_port; > proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; > proxy_set_h

Re: nginx proxy vs apache proxy

2013-06-11 Thread solitaryr
This apparently handles the proxying differently. Guess it's back to Apache since it handles it readily and has AJP support. Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,239872,240043#msg-240043 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http: