On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:04 PM Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:30:29PM -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
>
> > NTLM over HTTP is a 3 request "handshake" that must occur over the same
> TCP
> > connection.
> > My HTTP service implements the NTLMSSP acceptor and uses the cl
Hello!
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:30:29PM -0500, Michael B Allen wrote:
> NTLM over HTTP is a 3 request "handshake" that must occur over the same TCP
> connection.
> My HTTP service implements the NTLMSSP acceptor and uses the clients remote
> address and port like "10.11.12.13:54433" to track th
nt client connections?
>
Nevermind. As long as the Jespa-Connect-Id uniquely identifies the client,
it doesn't matter what the NGINX to backend connections are. They can be
the default 1.0.
So load balancing NTLM with my implementation using the above nginx.conf
directives works great. I d
Hi,
NTLM over HTTP is a 3 request "handshake" that must occur over the same TCP
connection.
My HTTP service implements the NTLMSSP acceptor and uses the clients remote
address and port like "10.11.12.13:54433" to track the authentication state
of each TCP connection.
My implementation also uses a
somehow use the upstream load balancing of NGINX
with this custom configuration, or will we have to define our own load
balancing logic in our nginx module?
Could we do something similar to:
ext_private_server http://load-balancer;
and then:
upstream load-balancer {
server http://private
> On 25 Feb 2022, at 08:30, Pawel Fraczek wrote:
>
> Thanks for the explanation. Sorry if I'm being dense but is there some way
> to get udp passive health check to fail to the next server?
>
> Meaning,based on my configuration, am I doing something wrong or is this
> simply unavailable wit
Thanks for the explanation. Sorry if I'm being dense but is there some way
to get udp passive health check to fail to the next server?
Meaning,based on my configuration, am I doing something wrong or is this
simply unavailable with udp?
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022, 1:31 AM Sergey Kandaurov wr
> On 23 Feb 2022, at 06:45, Pawel Fraczek wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm trying to building a syslog load balancer and I'm running into issues
> with the failover of UDP messages. TCP works just fine, when the server goes
> down, all messages failover to the active server. But with UDP, that does not
>
Hi, I'm trying to building a syslog load balancer and I'm running into
issues with the failover of UDP messages. TCP works just fine, when the
server goes down, all messages failover to the active server. But with UDP,
that does not happen. Maybe someone can point me to what I'm doing wrong.
Below
Hi Francis, thanks you!
Em ter., 15 de fev. de 2022 às 13:49, Francis Daly
escreveu:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:31:06PM -0300, Carlos Renato wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> > This what I get when trying to start NGINX with the simplified file.
> >
> > [root@proxy conf.d]# cat webgateway.conf
> > upst
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:31:06PM -0300, Carlos Renato wrote:
Hi there,
> This what I get when trying to start NGINX with the simplified file.
>
> [root@proxy conf.d]# cat webgateway.conf
> upstream webgateway {
>server 192.168.239.151:9090;
>server 192.168.239.152:9090;
> }
>
> server
Hi, Josef
This what I get when trying to start NGINX with the simplified file.
[root@proxy conf.d]# cat webgateway.conf
upstream webgateway {
server 192.168.239.151:9090;
server 192.168.239.152:9090;
}
server {
listen 9191;
proxy_pass webgateway;
}
}
[root@proxy conf.d]# nginx -t
n
Seems to me, that you are not using stream{} module as noted by
Francis, and you are still putting server block to http{}. If not,
post nginx -T
J.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 4:17 PM Carlos Renato wrote:
>
> Hi Francis,
> Thanks for the reply and willingness to help me.
>
> [root@proxy conf.d]# cat
Hi Francis,
Thanks for the reply and willingness to help me.
[root@proxy conf.d]# cat teste.conf
upstream webgateway {
server 192.168.239.151:9090;
server 192.168.239.152:9090;
}
server {
listen 9191;
proxy_pass webgateway;
}
[root@proxy conf.d]#
I cannot start NGINX.
Feb 15 01:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:29:50AM -0300, Carlos Renato wrote:
Hi there,
> My file is like this.
Untested by me, but I have edited this to now resemble what I think
you want...
> upstream webgateway {
>server 192.168.239.151:9090;
>server 192.168.239.152:9090;
> }
>
> server {
>lis
Hi Francis, Thanks for the reply.
My file is like this.
upstream webgateway {
server 192.168.239.151:9090;
server 192.168.239.152:9090;
keepalive 10;
}
server {
listen 9191;
server_name proxy.lab.local;
location / {
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_heade
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 08:38:07AM -0300, Carlos Renato wrote:
Hi there,
> Hello, I would like to use NGINX to balance traffic between two McAfee
> (standalone) proxy.
nginx as a server will listen for http or https requests; it does not "do"
http-proxy requests. (As in: it is not a http (forwar
Hello, I would like to use NGINX to balance traffic between two McAfee
(standalone) proxy.
I've made some advances and I'm able to open an HTTP page.
Now, I need the client to open an HTTPS request.
Em ter., 15 de fev. de 2022 às 00:54, Sergey A. Osokin
escreveu:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> hope you're d
Hi Carlos,
hope you're doing well.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:08:53PM -0300, Carlos Renato wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Can someone help me? I'm using NGINX to direct connections to two Proxy
> servers.
>
> I did a simple setup.
>
> upstream webgateway {
>server 192.168.239.151:9090;
>server
Hey guys,
Can someone help me? I'm using NGINX to direct connections to two Proxy
servers.
I did a simple setup.
upstream webgateway {
server 192.168.239.151:9090;
server 192.168.239.152:9090;
}
server {
listen 81;
server_name proxy.lab.local;
location / {
proxy_pass h
Hello,
I would like to log the clients requests information basically DNS
resolution requests A, PTR records etc..
How do I enable that logging?
Please advise.
Thanks
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,292863,292863#msg-292863
___
Hi Mr Sergey,
Thank you for your email, this was enough helpful for me.
Thanks once again.
Kind regards,
Jeffrey.
Le ven. 1 oct. 2021 à 17:09, Sergey A. Osokin a écrit :
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:47:53PM +, Aom Jeff Root wrote:
> > Hi dear,
> >
> >
> >- I'm student a
Hi Jeffrey,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:47:53PM +, Aom Jeff Root wrote:
> Hi dear,
>
>
>- I'm student and i work on open source web conferencing project (school
>project) I choose Openmeetings
>
> I work on clustering openmeetings with two nodes and I want to make single
> access to
Hi dear,
- I'm student and i work on open source web conferencing project (school
project) I choose Openmeetings
I work on clustering openmeetings with two nodes and I want to make single
access to the group server. I want to use nginx load balancer . How to
configure the nginx to make it
Hello!
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 09:13:37AM -0400, Oleg Pisklov wrote:
[...]
> Then a strange thing happens. I expect that new websocket connections will
> be distributed evenly among two backends. But most of them land on backend1,
> as if backend2 is still disabled. Sometimes there is one client
My current nginx configuration looks like:
worker_processes 1;
error_log /dev/stdout debug;
events { worker_connections 1024; }
http {
upstream back {
server backend1 max_fails=1 fail_timeout=10;
server backend2 max_fails=1 fail_timeout=10;
}
server {
listen 80;
locat
Hi Maxim,
Thanks a lot for the help. I will start to look into it.
Best,
Washik
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,291913,291916#msg-291916
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hello!
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:59:33PM -0400, malzad wrote:
> is it possible to implement a new load-balancing algorithm in Nginx just
> like “least_conn”, “ip_hash”? The algorithm will hash (not similar to
> generic hash provided by Nginx) some part of the URL and do s
Hello,
is it possible to implement a new load-balancing algorithm in Nginx just
like “least_conn”, “ip_hash”? The algorithm will hash (not similar to
generic hash provided by Nginx) some part of the URL and do some other
calculations, and based on the calculation, the request will be passed to
Anyone?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 5:25 PM satay wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Thanks for responding. I agree with your recommendation. I guess a direct
> upgrade from 1.12 to 1.16 (free community version) is possible and
> shouldn't break it.
>
> I'm preferring 1.61 since it's the latest stable version.
Thomas,
Thanks for the answer! I made the corrections and the nginx service worked.
Thank you.
Although it worked, I saw that the backend servers are receiving the IP
request from the proxy, is there any way to pass the source IP of the proxy
request preserving the source IP and port?
take a look
andersonsserra Wrote:
---
> nginx: [emerg] "stream" directive is not allowed here in
/etc/nginx/email/balanceador.conf:1
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,288282,288291#msg-288291
{} block as your nginx.conf is trying to do.
Thomas
On 6/6/20 6:51 PM, andersonsserra wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to do a round-robin load balancing for outgoing connections from
> my MTA servers. At first I tried it as follows:
>
> [root@proxy-lb02 email]#
Hi folks,
I'm trying to do a round-robin load balancing for outgoing connections from
my MTA servers. At first I tried it as follows:
[root@proxy-lb02 email]# pwd
/etc/nginx/email
[root@proxy-lb02 email]# cat balanceador.conf
stream {
upstream stream_backend
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:22 AM deprito wrote:
> Hello @arigatox,
>
> do you mind share with me, how to LB UDP protocol like wireguard?
>
> My nginx.conf
> user www-data;
> worker_processes auto;
> pid /run/nginx.pid;
> include /etc/nginx/modules-enabled/*.conf;
>
> stream {
>
> upstream syslog_u
Hello,
I would like to use nginx to load balance Citrix ICA sessions (socks
over https) to four netscalers. Nginx would just distribute the 5
sessions to 4 netscalers. Just tcp with ip hash, no ssl offloading
necessary. The traffic is approx. 5 Gbit/s. The connections are long
running approx. 1
Hello @arigatox,
do you mind share with me, how to LB UDP protocol like wireguard?
My nginx.conf
user www-data;
worker_processes auto;
pid /run/nginx.pid;
include /etc/nginx/modules-enabled/*.conf;
stream {
upstream syslog_udp {
server x.x.x.x:51820;
server x.x.x.x:51820;
}
se
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:01:35PM -0400, robe007 wrote:
Hi there,
> I have set up a load balancer with NGINX for two IIS web servers that works
> with sessions.
What is "a session"?
The answer to that may make it clear how to achieve what you want.
> upstream mybalancer {
> ip_hash;
>
I have set up a load balancer with NGINX for two IIS web servers that works
with sessions. Here is the NGINX configuration file I have created for the
load balancing:
#Log Format
log_format upstreamlog '$server_name to: $upstream_addr [$request] '
'upstrea
Hi Maxim,
Thanks for responding. I agree with your recommendation. I guess a direct
upgrade from 1.12 to 1.16 (free community version) is possible and
shouldn't break it.
I'm preferring 1.61 since it's the latest stable version. Beside the
upgrade, do you recommend any performance tuning shoul
Hi Satay,
On 19.02.2020 09:09, Satay Epic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've NGINX 1.12-1 running on CentOS 7.2 and being used for DNS load
> balancing. However I'm seeing lots of errors in the "dns.log".. I've
> no access to the system right now but error was
Hello,
I've NGINX 1.12-1 running on CentOS 7.2 and being used for DNS load
balancing. However I'm seeing lots of errors in the "dns.log".. I've
no access to the system right now but error was like.. "No response
received from the upstream server" The occurrence
Excellent! I upgraded to 1.16.1 and udp load balancing is working as
expected.
Thank you again Roman.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,286837,286842#msg-286842
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org
Thanks Roman, I will try a newer version and let you know
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,286837,286841#msg-286841
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 08:52:53AM -0500, arigatox wrote:
> Hi, I am testing nginx as a reverse proxy/load balancer for UDP. I have
> configured the upstream servers, and it is working fine, except one issue
> that is driving me crazy.
>
> It seems that nginx does not keep the udp source port
Hi, I am testing nginx as a reverse proxy/load balancer for UDP. I have
configured the upstream servers, and it is working fine, except one issue
that is driving me crazy.
It seems that nginx does not keep the udp source ports between requests. It
changes the source port on every request. So I can
What’s the result of curl when make you request direct to the backend port
1 and 10001?
> 在 2020年1月9日，下午9:49，梁维伟 <15521068...@163.com> 写道：
>
> Hi.
>
> I have this config below And I requested upstream resource and got 404
> response. However, when I modified 'listen 80' to 'listen 8081', I
Hi.
I have this config below And I requested upstream resource and got 404
response. However, when I modified 'listen 80' to 'listen 8081', I requested
upstream resource again, I got 200 response. I wonder why.
Thanks.
snippet of my nginx config
http {
upstream backend {
server IP:
QL servers
> listening on the same port using different names like you can with http? We
> don't want to perform any load balancing operation on them, we just want to
> be able to redirect to MySQL instances based on a logical name, same as on
> http.
>
> Question 2
> When
Hi all,
Question 1
Is it possible to have NGINX reverse proxy to multiple MySQL servers listening
on the same port using different names like you can with http? We don't want to
perform any load balancing operation on them, we just want to be able to
redirect to MySQL instances based
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:01:45AM -0500, emil.vikstrom wrote:
> I want to use nginx as a load balancer for tcp streams and because I want to
> share the load evenly over all machines I thought that least_conn would be
> the right strategy to use in this case. But I have stumbled upon an p
m the documentation
Syntax: least_conn;
Default:—
Context:upstream
Specifies that a group should use a load balancing method where a connection
is passed to the server with the least number of active connections, taking
into account weights of servers. If there are several such servers, the
hi experts,
We had tried hash type load balancing (explorer other types too), but we
could not find a rule / config where it can load balance based on cpu or
memory limit of application server
Do we need write plugin ourselves for the same ?
Thanks
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:13:35AM -0400, bwmetc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Cool. Thanks. Slightly related... given that the proxy_timeout is 10m by
> default, can ephemeral ports on the backend be shared by different clients
> making requests to nginx?
No. The port is bound to a session wi
Cool. Thanks. Slightly related... given that the proxy_timeout is 10m by
default, can ephemeral ports on the backend be shared by different clients
making requests to nginx?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,280540,280552#msg-280552
_
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 08:27:07PM -0400, bwmetc...@gmail.com wrote:
> A couple of questions regarding UDP load balancing. If a UDP listener is
> configured to expect a response from its upstream nodes, is it possible to
> have another IP outside of the pool of upstream nod
Hello,
A couple of questions regarding UDP load balancing. If a UDP listener is
configured to expect a response from its upstream nodes, is it possible to
have another IP outside of the pool of upstream nodes send a response to the
ephemeral port where nginx is expecting a response? I'm p
Aravind,
On 21/06/2018 11:35, aRaviNd wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to configure tcp load balancing with Nginx with below
> configuration.
>
> stream {
> server {
> listen 25;
> resolver 1.1.1.1;
> proxy_pass $host:25;
> }
Hi All,
I am trying to configure tcp load balancing with Nginx with below
configuration.
stream {
server {
listen 25;
resolver 1.1.1.1;
proxy_pass $host:25;
}
}
If I try to connect mx1.abc.com i would like to expand my variable $host to
mx1.abc.com and internally
I’m working on a project to perform A/B testing with the web hosting platform.
The simple version is that we are hosted everything on Azure and want to
compare using their Web Apps versus running a VM with IIS.
My question is about load balancing since there seems to be two ways to go
about
ne have a suggestion about a simple, free, open source web app,
> with a database that I could test out and get familiar with, nginx's load
> balancing functionality on?
>
> Thank you,
>leeand00
>
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> https://forum.nginx.o
Does anyone have a suggestion about a simple, free, open source web app,
with a database that I could test out and get familiar with, nginx's load
balancing functionality on?
Thank you,
leeand00
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,278284,278284#msg-2
I've setup a simplisti UDP load balancing as follow :
stream {
upstream dtls_udp_upstreams {
hash $remote_addr:remote_port;
server preprod.mycorp.com:5684;
}
server {
listen 5684 udp;
proxy_pass dtls_udp_upstreams;
proxy_responses 1;
}
}
I notice that the bala
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:02 AM Sékine Coulibaly
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm evaluating Nginx Plus for a UDP Load Balancer but can't make it work.
> The packets are spoofed correctly on the LB side (as seen with tcpdump,
> where I can see packets created, the source IP being the one of the client,
> the
Hi,
I'm evaluating Nginx Plus for a UDP Load Balancer but can't make it work.
The packets are spoofed correctly on the LB side (as seen with tcpdump,
where I can see packets created, the source IP being the one of the client,
the destination the one of the selected upstream). However, on the upstr
Hi Everyone
I would like to ask a little help to understand and refine my config.
The basic problem:
We have 2 nginx frontend on a same site (only for backup and sandbox the
secound).
We have 2 graylog backend servers on different sites.
The nginx servers and SERVER_B is on the same site.
The Ngi
Hi Everyone
I would like to ask a little help to understand and refine my config.
The basic problem:
We have 2 nginx frontend on a same site (only for backup and sandbox the
secound).
We have 2 graylog backend servers on different sites.
The nginx servers and SERVER_B is on the same site.
The Ngi
to know if it make sense to make load balancing based
on this connection ID.
Here is the use case:
You have a cluster of servers behind a unique IP address.
You do load balancing using IP address.
You use UDP/DTLS.
Some clients are behind NAT and so theirs IP/port can chang
Hi,
> Certainly things will be different if
> requests are not equal, though this is what least_conn is expected
> to address (and again, it does so better than just testing two
> choices).
Awesome, I hope to address this issue in my research. My suspicion is
that round-robin and random will c
Hello!
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:43:37AM -0400, Adam Schwartz wrote:
> > On the other hand, there is API in nginx which allows to implement
> > any load balancing algorithm needed.
>
> Cool! I was looking for something like that.
>
> > As for the algorithms you&
> On the other hand, there is API in nginx which allows to implement
> any load balancing algorithm needed.
Cool! I was looking for something like that.
> As for the algorithms you've mentioned, "power of two choices" seems
> to be better than random, though
Hello!
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 03:11:36PM -0400, Adam Schwartz wrote:
> I’m Adam and I’ve been researching load balancing for my
> undergraduate senior project. I’m particularly interested in the
> behavior of the “power of two choices” and join-idle-queue
> algorithms on Ngin
Hello,
I’m Adam and I’ve been researching load balancing for my undergraduate senior
project. I’m particularly interested in the behavior of the “power of two
choices” and join-idle-queue algorithms on Nginx.
I’ve found that the `ngx_http_upstream_module` specifies a `least_conn` and
Hello,
> Also, has anyone tried using nginx for DNS load balancing in production?
I would not recommend using nginx to load-balance DNS traffic at all.
nginx is just a dumb UDP proxy and I doubt it performs well enough
in a DNS setup.
dnsdist [1] is written with this purpose in mind and u
926897
Average Latency (s): 0.000794 (min 0.000645, max 0.026699)
Latency StdDev (s): 0.000750
>From I can tell, it seems nginx is throttling the nameservers because of
perceived failures in getting responses from them. How can I troubleshoot
this further?
Also, has anyone tried using
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:44:00PM -0700, Matthew Ceroni wrote:
Hi there,
Untested, but...
> https://www.nginx.com/blog/dns-service-discovery-nginx-plus/
> The issue is around where to set the variable. I have tried setting it in
> the upstream block but that errors saying set is not valid in t
https://www.nginx.com/blog/dns-service-discovery-nginx-plus/
Testing out the options provided in the above link. Specifically the
"Setting the Domain Name in a Variable". The example given is L7 load
balancing.
I have a need for L4 using upstream, yet I am not able to get this method
t
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:58:50PM +0800, Gwenole Gendrot wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've been using nginx 1.11.3 to test the UDP load balancing feature, using a
> "basic" configuration.
> The functionality is working out of the box, but a new socket will b
Hi,
I've been using nginx 1.11.3 to test the UDP load balancing feature,
using a "basic" configuration.
The functionality is working out of the box, but a new socket will be
created by the proxy for each packet sent from a client (to the same
connection). This leads to reso
Hi Dewangga,
On 01/08/16 10:36, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
Hello!
On 08/01/2016 04:19 PM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
Hi Dewangga,
I'm not quite sure what your desired outcome would be by connecting to
two servers at the same time for a single client but it won't work the
way you might think it
the same table in multiple
> servers being written to at the same time. See this blog post for more
> information:
>
> https://www.nginx.com/blog/advanced-mysql-load-balancing-with-nginx-plus/
>
> Kind Regards
> Andrew
>
> On 01/08/16 09:20, Dewangga Bachrul Alam
ation:
https://www.nginx.com/blog/advanced-mysql-load-balancing-with-nginx-plus/
Kind Regards
Andrew
On 01/08/16 09:20, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
Hello!
I got curios with load balancing algorithm, I got scenarios like this.
I have 3 galera cluster, each cluster have 3 node and it
Hello!
I got curios with load balancing algorithm, I got scenarios like this.
I have 3 galera cluster, each cluster have 3 node and it was solved with
stream module.
Cluster1:
Node1-Cluster1: 192.168.11.1
Node2-Cluster1: 192.168.11.2
Node3-Cluster1: 192.168.11.3
Cluster2:
Node1-Cluster2
On Wednesday 13 April 2016 12:21:52 B.R. wrote:
> As per the docs, I do not see a mean of doing what you wish directly in an
> upstream block.
> That cut-off might be a feature request you could post on their bug tracker.
>
> In the meanwhile, you might parse data about servers from an upstream gr
hat should be available before an error response is returned.
>
> The scenario I am looking into is one where Nginx can manage load balancing
> across servers in a tier and there are multiple tiers. If less than 50%
> servers are available in any tier I would like to respond with a HTTP
returned.
The scenario I am looking into is one where Nginx can manage load balancing
across servers in a tier and there are multiple tiers. If less than 50%
servers are available in any tier I would like to respond with a HTTP
failure and the hardware load balancer can then route traffic to a stan
Hi.
Am 07-03-2016 15:33, schrieb Pavlo Zhuk:
Yes, it is https://www.nginx.com/resources/admin-guide/proxy-protocol/
Please pay attention that only V1 is supported!
http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/file/tip/src/core/ngx_proxy_protocol.c
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#se
Yes, it is https://www.nginx.com/resources/admin-guide/proxy-protocol/
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Chino Aureus wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Newbie here. Would like to ask if NGINX supports Proxy Protocol. This to
> expose client IP addresses to the backend nodes.
>
>
> Regards,
> Chino
>
>
Hi,
Newbie here. Would like to ask if NGINX supports Proxy Protocol. This to
expose client IP addresses to the backend nodes.
Regards,
Chino
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Wow, was struggling with that for a week already.
Can’t believe that was it.
Thank you Valentin and Francis!
> Op 15-dec.-2015, om 12:26 heeft Valentin V. Bartenev het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 11:56:43 Bram wrote:
>> Problem is that it will not accept anything be
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 11:56:43 Bram wrote:
> Problem is that it will not accept anything besides $remote_addr and
> $request_uri.
> For example:
>
> upstream loadbalancer {
> hash $server_name consistent:
There's a typo: you've used a colon at the end of the directive.
wbr,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:56:43AM +0100, Bram wrote:
Hi there,
> Problem is that it will not accept anything besides $remote_addr and
> $request_uri.
> For example:
>
> upstream loadbalancer {
> hash $server_name consistent:
Use ; not :
> #hash $request_uri consistent;
>
number of arguments in "hash" directive in
/etc/nginx/nginx-loadbalancing.conf:6
> Op 15-dec.-2015, om 10:58 heeft Valentin V. Bartenev het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 10:13:35 Bram Verdonck wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>&
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 10:13:35 Bram Verdonck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I wish to use load balancing in front of a shared webhosting cluster with
> multiple domains.
> To make optimal use of resources, it would make sense to do load balancing
> based on domain instead
Hi all,
I wish to use load balancing in front of a shared webhosting cluster with
multiple domains.
To make optimal use of resources, it would make sense to do load balancing
based on domain instead of random or based on IP.
I noticed that there is a hash parameter but I’m unable to use
ark :
>
>> Good day Guys.
>>
>> I would like to ask if someone could please verify my configs :
>> http://pastebin.com/8Xk63RYD
>> http://pastebin.com/EfNSpvMV
>>
>> I have a Nginx server sitting in front of two Apache servers.
>> I'm using Nginx a
http://pastebin.com/8Xk63RYD
> http://pastebin.com/EfNSpvMV
>
> I have a Nginx server sitting in front of two Apache servers.
> I'm using Nginx as a reverse caching / load balancing solution.
> But what I'm trying achieve is to cache only for imag
ng Nginx as a reverse caching / load balancing solution.
> But what I'm trying achieve is to cache only for images, css and Js.
>
> All in all it appears it all works.
>
> The other question I would like to ask is, does the order of location
> matter?
>
Depends. For regu
Good day Guys.
I would like to ask if someone could please verify my configs :
http://pastebin.com/8Xk63RYD
http://pastebin.com/EfNSpvMV
I have a Nginx server sitting in front of two Apache servers.
I'm using Nginx as a reverse caching / load balancing solution.
But what I'm trying ach
Hi.
Am 14-08-2015 07:55, schrieb Chino Aureus:
Hi,
I'm new to nginx. Need help understanding the http/s load balancing
capability of nginx open source versus nginx plus. Appreciate any info
regarding this query :)
You can find a comparison between the version in the feature matrix.
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
