Hello!
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 02:56:12AM -0400, crespin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't understand why b->last is used to initialize b->end.
> Why it's not :
> b->end = b->start + size;
There is no real difference, though current code produces 1 less
assembly instruction at least on gcc 4.2 w
Hello,
I don't understand why b->last is used to initialize b->end.
Why it's not :
b->end = b->start + size;
Regards,
yves
# HG changeset patch
# User Yves Crespin
# Date 1407480933 -7200
# Node ID 74265a0edba677c967f532de789a4589436aa5fb
# Parent a62fffc16af816612a4acf34c7a4781f454fa5d1
n