Hello!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 06:34:52PM -0400, bcx wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion. I understand about the DoS issue.
> proxy_cache_bypass indeed is the solution. Documentation was not clear about
> it, but the result is written to cache. The cache is only bypassed in the
> lookup fase,
Thank you for your suggestion. I understand about the DoS issue.
proxy_cache_bypass indeed is the solution. Documentation was not clear about
it, but the result is written to cache. The cache is only bypassed in the
lookup fase, not in the write back fase.
I worked out this bit of configuration. T
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:20:41PM -0400, bcx wrote:
> I noticed that the nginx http proxy module by default does nothing with the
> Cache-Control request header that is sent by browsers.
>
> Most browsers (I tested Crome and Firefox, but from my online research it
> showed that even Inte
I noticed that the nginx http proxy module by default does nothing with the
Cache-Control request header that is sent by browsers.
Most browsers (I tested Crome and Firefox, but from my online research it
showed that even Internet Explorer has the same behaviour) send a
Cache-Control: no-cache hea
