Hello!
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:09:41PM +, Phil Lello wrote:
[...]
> > > A secondary requirement is a mechanism to implement server-push, so that
> > > can specify page dependencies, rather than requiring
> > > inspection of content within the server.
> > >
> > > Is any work currently bei
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Phil Lello wrote:
>
> Given that the current state of HTTP/2 support in browsers seems to be
> forcing the use of TLS, it seems that the opportunity for proxies to kick
> in is relatively limited.
>
Why could not proxies
be used with HTTP/2? Why would you exp
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:40:34PM +, Phil Lello wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What's the best place to find details on planned features for HTTP/2
> > support?
> >
> > I've only been looking at HTTP/2 for a few days, so forgive me
Hello!
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:40:34PM +, Phil Lello wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the best place to find details on planned features for HTTP/2
> support?
>
> I've only been looking at HTTP/2 for a few days, so forgive me if this is
> already covered.
>
> It seems pretty obvious to me that i
Hi,
What's the best place to find details on planned features for HTTP/2
support?
I've only been looking at HTTP/2 for a few days, so forgive me if this is
already covered.
It seems pretty obvious to me that it provides an opportunity for
potentially significant performance gains if changes are
