> Can you name such applications that are only able to talk HTTP/2?
The developers I support would like to use GRPC [1] which is HTTP/2 only.
I need to provide an HA/LB system to support them.
I'm not saying this would be easy to implement, only that I need it :-)
Thank you for your help,
Nichol
I think what they are asking is to support the transport layer so that they
don't have to support both protocols on whatever endpoint they are
developing.
Maybe I'm wrong and someone has grand plans about multiplexing requests to
an upstream with http/2, but I haven't seen anyone ask for that expl
On Monday 14 December 2015 18:24:01 Nicholas Capo wrote:
> My specific use case is to support an HTTP/2 application behind a load
> balancer (reverse proxy).
>
> Also as a backend LB between services that could use a long running HTTP/2
> connection to do their communication.
>
> Places where I n
My specific use case is to support an HTTP/2 application behind a load
balancer (reverse proxy).
Also as a backend LB between services that could use a long running HTTP/2
connection to do their communication.
Places where I need an LB, but also know that both ends would /prefer/ to
use HTTP/2.
Hello!
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:57:02AM -0800, Frank Liu wrote:
> "multiplexing" seems to be a good use case for upstream proxying. We don't
> have control how fast end users adopting HTTP/2, so we may still have tons
> of HTTP/1.x requests coming in, but we can certainly upgrade upstream
> ser
On Monday 14 December 2015 09:57:02 Frank Liu wrote:
> "multiplexing" seems to be a good use case for upstream proxying. We don't
> have control how fast end users adopting HTTP/2, so we may still have tons
> of HTTP/1.x requests coming in, but we can certainly upgrade upstream
> servers that we co
"multiplexing" seems to be a good use case for upstream proxying. We don't
have control how fast end users adopting HTTP/2, so we may still have tons
of HTTP/1.x requests coming in, but we can certainly upgrade upstream
servers that we control to support HTTP/2. If nginx upstream proxy module
can a
Hello!
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:03:15PM +, Nicholas Capo wrote:
> Is HTTP/2 proxy support planned for the near future?
Short answer:
No, there are no plans.
Long answer:
There is almost no sense to implement it, as the main HTTP/2
benefit is that it allows multiplexing many requests wi
Is HTTP/2 proxy support planned for the near future?
Nicholas
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 8:14 PM Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 03:00:23PM +0100, bjun...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > i've tried to use nginx as http/2 gateway for backends which only
>
Hello!
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 03:00:23PM +0100, bjun...@gmail.com wrote:
> i've tried to use nginx as http/2 gateway for backends which only
> supporting HTTP 1.1. If a backend is already HTTP/2 ready, than HTTP/2
> should be used.
>
> When i test my configuration (simple p
Hi,
i've tried to use nginx as http/2 gateway for backends which only
supporting HTTP 1.1. If a backend is already HTTP/2 ready, than HTTP/2
should be used.
When i test my configuration (simple proxy_pass / upstream), the connection
from nginx to the backend is always HTTP 1.1 (even i
11 matches
Mail list logo
