OK. Thank you very much . I will do an experiment to find out this
2014/1/16 itpp2012
> renenglish Wrote:
> ---
> > Sorry I can’t get it .
> >
> > If host A has added the counter and failed to response, the request
> > would be failed over to
renenglish Wrote:
---
> Sorry I can’t get it .
>
> If host A has added the counter and failed to response, the request
> would be failed over to host B with successful response, so the
> counter would be added twines. Wouldn’t it ?
Then a condit
Sorry I can’t get it .
If host A has added the counter and failed to response, the request would be
failed over to host B with successful response, so the counter would be added
twines. Wouldn’t it ?
在 2014年1月14日，下午5:48，itpp2012 写道：
> Unless the request is getting que'd while there is a short
Unless the request is getting que'd while there is a short wait for host A
to get online AND fail-over is also happening, its not likely to be added
twice.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245979,246388#msg-246388
___
nginx mail
Can any one help ?
2014/1/3 任勇全
> Hi all:
> I am wondering if I set:
> proxy_next_upstream error timeout;
> Fox example , if the requested service is a counter , I issue the request
> use the interface http://example.com/incr . The request is failed on my
> first host A, then it is passed t
Hi all:
I am wondering if I set:
proxy_next_upstream error timeout;
Fox example , if the requested service is a counter , I issue the request use
the interface http://example.com/incr . The request is failed on my first host
A, then it is passed to the second host B , is the counter likely be
