Hello!
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:49:23PM -0300, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote:
> Hum, a documentation of this use case is recommended. Personally, for me it
> is completely unknown and uncommon.
>
> Also, isn't caching entirely related to the URL the user used, and has
> nothing to do with the backe
Hum, a documentation of this use case is recommended. Personally, for me it
is completely unknown and uncommon.
Also, isn't caching entirely related to the URL the user used, and has
nothing to do with the backend host?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun,
Hello!
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 06:15:56PM -0300, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I stucked a while with a config problem where proxy_cache_key default value
> was $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args".
>
> Then I realized it really didn't make. A better value
> $scheme$host$uri$is_arg
Hello all,
I stucked a while with a config problem where proxy_cache_key default value
was $scheme$proxy_host$uri$is_args$args".
Then I realized it really didn't make. A better value
$scheme$host$uri$is_args$args" is much more reasonable, as the reverse
proxy requests comes from many server {} wi
