Re: All workers in 'D' state using sendfile

2013-06-13 Thread Host DL
Thanks you for clarification on this issue The last modification that worked properly was reducing workers I tried both 64, 24 and 12 workers and less workers was better in performances during the peak time I can't recognize why but it works like a charm PS: Dual E5-2620 has been used which lead

Re: All workers in 'D' state using sendfile

2013-06-10 Thread Host DL
Dear Maxim, Thanks for your response, I don't think it will help much since all of my files are larger enough than 2MB Regarding AIO problem in linux, do you think using AIO + sendfile together on FreeBSD will be better in performance in my case? Respect ==

Re: All workers in 'D' state using sendfile

2013-06-09 Thread Host DL
Hello Maxim, Thanks for your response, and sorry that I am new to mailing list and my 1st message may was not very clear to you I've already read all posts in this conversation and all tuning options has been tested I'm using 8x 2TB SATA ENT in RAID10 level + 64G RAM on my box CentOS 5.9 x64_84

Re: All workers in 'D' state using sendfile

2013-06-08 Thread Host DL
Hi, I am facing the same exact issue as explained by Drew, is there any working solution to tune nginx for higher throughput? or how to deal with sleeping D state nginx processes ? i can post my server specs and nginx conf is needed but I would like to ask Drew if he found the working properly