Hello!
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 10:03:51AM -0400, Pavel Murzakov wrote:
> Thank you.
> I knew that there was a patch. Just wondering whether it's going to be
> merged or not cause it's more handy when you don't need to patch anything.
Unlikely, unless there will be some positive feedback on the
Thank you.
I knew that there was a patch. Just wondering whether it's going to be
merged or not cause it's more handy when you don't need to patch anything.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,200086,276296#msg-276296
___
nginx m
Hello!
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 05:20:11PM -0400, Pavel Murzakov wrote:
> Is there any chance that abstract namespace support will be added for unix
> sockets?
You may try the patch here, likely it still applies:
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2016-October/008878.html
--
Maxim
Is there any chance that abstract namespace support will be added for unix
sockets?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,200086,276278#msg-276278
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/ngin
