Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 Pre 6 patch for Nginx 1.11.*]

2016-06-25 Thread rikske
Hi, Fixed. Consider it done. Thanks Sergey A. Osokin for the info and Kurt Cancemi for the patch. Regards, Rik Ske > Hello, > > I attached a trivial patch that fixes the build. OpenSSL removed unused > error codes and SSL_R_NO_CIPHERS_PASSED was one of them. > > Apply with: > patch -p1 < 0001

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 Pre 6 patch for Nginx 1.11.*

2016-06-24 Thread rikske
No reason? The API/ABI wasn't stable either with the release of the previous patches to made it compatible with OpenSSl's pre-release for example @Gobelet's patch. If someone made a patch, please let me know. > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:58:27AM +0200, rik...@deds.nl wrote: >> >> There could be

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 Pre 6 patch for Nginx 1.11.*

2016-06-24 Thread rikske
Hi, That was not the question. There could be someone who has a pre-patch for version 6, who is also testing OpenSSL, just like @Gobelet's patch did before with pre 5. > Hi, > > it already has been discussed, > https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/860#comment:10 > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:05:0

OpenSSL 1.1.0 Pre 6 patch for Nginx 1.11.*

2016-06-24 Thread rikske
Hi, Does someone have a OpenSSL 1.1.0 Pre 6 patch for Nginx 1.11.*? So that it is possible to compile Nginx 1.11.* with the latest OpenSSL 1.1.0 Pre 6 git clone (today). Want to test some new OpenSSL 1.1.0 features, with the latest Git clone as OpenSSL version 1.1 seems near final. "src/event/n

Re: Nginx HTTP/2 module (ALPN) TLS on RHEL 7.*

2015-09-30 Thread rikske
Hi Andrew, Thanks for your reply. I am familiar with the command but had forgotten that if ALPN is not supported by the OpenSSL client you also can't test it. This sounds strange but I thought my original command was not right. Because the program always arrived with all options. The OpenSSL cl

Re: Nginx HTTP/2 module (ALPN) TLS on RHEL 7.*

2015-09-28 Thread rikske
Hello. I would like to add here that it is important to get an answer. Google is going to remove SPDY support in Chrome, early 2016. That is 3 months from now. Moreover, NPN support will also be dropped with ALPN as its successor. Since by far the majority of users, use Chrome and Chrome is autom

Re: Nginx HTTP/2 module (ALPN) TLS on RHEL 7.*

2015-09-28 Thread rikske
Hi, I don't know. Can't find anything about Nginx, OpenSSL ALPN and/or NPN in the logs. HTTP/2 seems to be running fine here according to my testing tools. But there is nothing about ALPN or NPN. The only thing i can find in there code is that the Nginx should warn the user in case, the enduser

Re: Nginx HTTP/2 module (ALPN) TLS on RHEL 7.*

2015-09-28 Thread rikske
Hi, So what you're saying. Nginx HTTP/2 module won't work on RHEL 7.1 with (ALPN) TLS, until you are using OpenSSL version 1.0.2 on RHEL 7.1 in any manner whatsoever? Can anyone confirm this? Thanks, Regards, Rik Ske > Hello! > > On 09/28/2015 08:40 PM, rik...@deds.nl wrote: >> Dear, >> >> D

Nginx HTTP/2 module (ALPN) TLS on RHEL 7.*

2015-09-28 Thread rikske
Dear, Does the Nginx HTTP/2 module work on RHEL 7.1 with (ALPN) TLS? It seems like the HTTP/2 module is enabled by default in your RHEL 7.1 based rpm and srpm. Your Nginx website writes about: "Note that accepting HTTP/2 connections over TLS requires the “Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation”

Re: 200ms Delay With SPDY - Nginx 1.6.x ?

2015-02-18 Thread rikske
> [...] >> Hi Maxim, >> >> Understood. Apart from the fact what SPDY can mean for someone specific. >> There is a flaw in and which prevents "tcp_nodelay" in Nginx 1.6. to >> function correctly. >> >> How to fix that. >> > There are several options: > > - you can backport 1.7 diff to 1.6; > > - you

Re: 200ms Delay With SPDY - Nginx 1.6.x ?

2015-02-18 Thread rikske
> On 2/18/15 6:57 PM, rik...@deds.nl wrote: >>> On 2/18/15 5:42 PM, rik...@deds.nl wrote: You can't optimize a site to the max without SPDY. >>> >>> That's doesn't match our experience. >>> >>> Also, enabling SPDY doesn't make your site faster automagically. It >>> is not a silver bullet. >>>

Re: 200ms Delay With SPDY - Nginx 1.6.x ?

2015-02-18 Thread rikske
> On 2/18/15 5:42 PM, rik...@deds.nl wrote: >> You can't optimize a site to the max without SPDY. > > That's doesn't match our experience. > > Also, enabling SPDY doesn't make your site faster automagically. It > is not a silver bullet. > > -- > Maxim Konovalov > http://nginx.com > > __

Re: 200ms Delay With SPDY - Nginx 1.6.x ?

2015-02-18 Thread rikske
> On Wednesday 18 February 2015 00:41:34 rik...@deds.nl wrote: >> Dear, >> >> While searching for Nginx optimize patches: >> >> https://josephscott.org/archives/2014/12/nginx-1-7-8-fixes-200ms-delay-with-spdy/ >> >> Came to my attention. >> >> Can anyone confirm if the '200ms Delay With SPDY' probl

200ms Delay With SPDY - Nginx 1.6.x ?

2015-02-17 Thread rikske
Dear, While searching for Nginx optimize patches: https://josephscott.org/archives/2014/12/nginx-1-7-8-fixes-200ms-delay-with-spdy/ Came to my attention. Can anyone confirm if the '200ms Delay With SPDY' problem also applies to Nginx 1.6.x? Thanks, Regards, Rik Ske _