I use perl a lot,
and I noticed
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_perl_module.html
for several years has been documented as
"The module is experimental, caveat emptor applies."
So I have been somewhat avoiding testing its use.
Does anyone know if this is suitable to use in high traffic produc
Hello,
If I have the following config
upstream ImageCluster {
server 10.1.1.1;
server 10.1.1.2;
server 10.1.1.3;
hash $cachekey consistent;
}
and wish to swap 10.1.1.3 to 10.1.1.5
would it be better to delete 10.1.1.3, restart and wait for the hash keys
to update,
add 10.1.1.5 and then
cachekey consistent;
}
Again, thanks for your reply.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Roman Arutyunyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 21 Jan 2016, at 15:41, highclass99 wrote:
> >
> > I have a question about "hash $cachekey" consistent;
> > Would the following Conf
I have a question about "hash $cachekey" consistent;
Would the following Config 1, Config 2, Config 3 be exactly the same of
different?
i.e. if I swap the configurations would the cache keys stay consistent?
The reason I am asking is I have a large configuration similar to Config 2
and am not sure
upstream myCloud{
server 10.0.0.1 weight=10;
server 10.0.0.2 weight=20;
}
For 30 sequential requests,
will it work like
A.
10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.2 -> 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.2 -> ... total 10
times repeat
or will it work like
B.
10.0.0.1 ... 10 times repeat -> 10.0.0.2... 20 times repeat
>Is there any reason to indicate that the weighting used in nginx plus is
not the same as used in the OSS version?
First of all this is a nginx plus only feature.
It is NOT available in the OSS version.
> If so, could you not just look at the module to examine how the weighting
is determined?
Al
Hello,
Anyone know how the least_conn upstream option works in nginx plus?
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_upstream_module.html#least_conn
says
"Specifies that a group should use a load balancing method where a request
is passed to the server with the least average response time and least
Hello,
I am curious whether nginx is suitable for windows in high traffic
production environment?
http://nginx.org/en/docs/windows.html says
"Version of nginx for Windows uses the native Win32 API (not the Cygwin
emulation layer). Only the select() connection processing method is
currently used,
t was sincerely a mistake.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:29 AM, highclass99 wrote:
> I have server A with a large HDD at IDC 1 (TB hdd)
> I have server B with cheap bandwidth at IDC 2 (very small virtual server
> 20 GB hdd)
>
> I send all image requests to server B, and it caches fro
I have server A with a large HDD at IDC 1 (TB hdd)
I have server B with cheap bandwidth at IDC 2 (very small virtual server 20
GB hdd)
I send all image requests to server B, and it caches from A.
My problem is that on server IO is really high
Server B iostat
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s
I have server A with a large HDD at IDC 1 (TB hdd)
I have server B with cheap bandwidth at IDC 2 (very small virtual server 20
GB hdd)
I send all image requests to server B, and it caches from A.
My problem is that on server IO is really high
Server B iostat
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s
11 matches
Mail list logo
