Re: Questions regarding spdy module, browser behaviour and "access forbidden by rule"

On 09/04/2014 12:04 AM, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > On Wednesday 03 September 2014 23:50:07 georg wrote: >> On 09/03/2014 10:23 PM, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: >>> On Wednesday 03 September 2014 20:18:50 georg wrote: >>> [..] >>>> However, using Iceweasel

Re: Questions regarding spdy module, browser behaviour and "access forbidden by rule"

On 09/04/2014 12:39 AM, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > On Thursday 04 September 2014 02:04:09 Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: >> On Wednesday 03 September 2014 23:50:07 georg wrote: >>> On 09/03/2014 10:23 PM, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 03 Septe

Re: Questions regarding spdy module, browser behaviour and "access forbidden by rule"

Hi Valentin, Thanks for your help. On 09/03/2014 10:23 PM, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > On Wednesday 03 September 2014 20:18:50 georg wrote: > [..] >> However, using Iceweasel 31.0-1~bpo70+1 (out of wheezy-backports), the >> browser console reads various 403 forbidden, an

Questions regarding spdy module, browser behaviour and "access forbidden by rule"

ll vhosts using it. Is this correct? Could I circumvent this using two ips, one spdy enabled, and one spdy disabled? Thanks in advance, cheers, Georg P.S.: Nginx is awesome - thanks for your work! [1] http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=BPynrmLg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatur