Re: Translating an F5 rule

2013-03-21 Thread WBrown
> > proxy_set_header SWSSLHDR $server_port; > > > > nice catch! But once again, because HTTP_REQUEST is client-side, so > says this F5-certified engineer with reference to the docs, it should > be $proxy_port instead of $server_port. Thanks to everyone that responded to my questions. Nginx ha

Re: Translating an F5 rule

2013-03-19 Thread WBrown
peter wrote on 03/19/2013 01:54:20 PM: > You might find that you get most traction with open resty ? its an > nginx bundle project that includes ngx_lua, > HttpHeadersMoreModule and a bunch of other mopdules that are great > for transforming requests > and implementing F5-like logic. I have bee

RE: Translating an F5 rule

2013-03-19 Thread WBrown
Peter Booth wrote on 03/19/2013 10:43:12 AM: > The code does the following: > > 1. remove an HTTP header named "SWSSLHDR" > 2. replaces it with SWSSLHDR: port, where the port is the local port of > the "current context's TCP connection", presumably the port that your F5 > virtual server is listen

Translating an F5 rule

2013-03-19 Thread WBrown
I am configuring Nginx to sit in front of several IIS web servers to do load balancing and SSL signing. THe IIS application is supplied by an outside vendor. I have the load balancing and SSL signing working, with one exception. The login page doesn't work. :( When the vendor hosts this ap

Re: Reverse Proxy Data Diode

2013-03-18 Thread WBrown
From: "Camayoc" > I'd argue the commercial solutions are value for money, given the > complexities. Not to mention most organizations that would need such a device like having someone to hold accountable (usually via lawsuit) when it fails. Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message a

Re: The service is not available. Please try again later.

2013-03-15 Thread WBrown
> From: "Reddirt" > I got past that error and now the nginx error log has this: > > 2013/03/14 14:22:10 [error] 1537#0: *1 connect() failed (111: Connection > refused) while connecting to upstream, client: 192.168.20.3, server: , > request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://127.0.0.1:3000/";,

Re: nginx: [emerg] invalid host in upstream

2013-03-14 Thread WBrown
From: "Reddirt" > bitnami@linux:/opt/bitnami$ sudo ./ctlscript.sh start nginx > nginx: [emerg] invalid host in upstream "127.0.0.1:3000/ndeavor" in > /opt/bitnami/nginx/conf/vhosts/ndeavor.conf:2 What is your upstream section of the configuration file? Do you have the "/ndeavor" as pa

Re: 502 bad gateway error with php5-fpm on Debian 7

2013-03-01 Thread WBrown
> > Dump question, but why did you put the vhost-files into "conf.d"? > > Normally > > they are stored in "sites-available" and symlinked in "sites-enabled". > > nginx > > (as apache) uses this directory to read all information about the vhosts. > > Are there any templates in "sites-enabled"?