Oh I wish I could go, bit far to fly (from Aus) unfortunately.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Yichun Zhang (agentzh)
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've recently created the Bay Area OpenResty Meeup group on meetup.com:
>
> http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-OpenResty-Meetup/
>
> You're welcome to join
Indeed. The Wikipedia page covers it quite well FYI -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP/2
So what is really being asked is for a roadmap for the implementation of
the non-draft differences (i.e HTTP/2.0 allows for non TLS communication,
and multiplexes differently). I am sure nginx will once again
Thank you, that makes sense and a bit of testing reveals that is correct.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:38:10PM +1000, SplitIce wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have spent the day troubleshooting
Hi all,
I have spent the day troubleshooting why one server in our network reloaded
/ tested configuration extremely slowly.
We have found that server_names scales very poorly, once a certain point is
reached (approx 5.5k entries globally, 5k entries for a single host)
performance drops from a <0
I would like to second this.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:03 PM, JackB wrote:
> The subject is a quote of Maxim Dounin in a discussion found here:
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?29,246885,246902#msg-246902
>
> It would be nice to have a detailed list of SPDY functionality that could
> be
> use
Thank you agentz, that looks amazing. I will be including that in the next
server software push.
And also Maxim, thank you for you for taking the time to prepare those
figures. I am going to my own testing and presuming that holds with our
usecase / modules I will be deploying --with-debug myself.
My bad I missed that sentence in the docco.
Thanks, Ill be using map. That blog lead me down the wrong track.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:15:54PM +0930, SplitIce wrote:
>
> > I also think I found that 0 l
I also think I found that 0 length keys wont be stored. This isn't in the
documentation but if I understand the code correctly they aren't, is this
correct?
I could use a map then and get considerable flexibility.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:06 PM, SplitIce wrote:
> Does anyone
Does anyone know if there is any truth to this blog post:
http://gadelkareem.com/2012/03/25/limit-requests-per-ip-on-nginx-using-httplimitzonemodule-and-httplimitreqmodule-except-whitelist/
And if so where about in the code its implemented? I was trying to find out
if its possible to use a map to
