x mailing list
nginx@nginx.org <mailto:nginx@nginx.org>
https://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
<https://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx>
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
https://mailman.nginx.org/mailman
ender or the
Company accepts no liability for damage caused by any virus transmitted
in this email or error or omissions.
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
https://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
re it between
workers.
This is big.
Congrats, Dima and team.
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
https://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
covered by this documentation.
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
https://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Khomutov who are the primary authors of the
code, Maxim Dounin, who have been helping with the architecture and code
reviews and many other individuals and companies who helped us to make
it happen.
I am very proud of you.
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
Hi,
We've just launched our annual nginx survey and welcome you to share
your feedback:
https://survey.developernation.net/name/nis1
Thanks,
Maxim
On 10.09.2021 02:42, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is just a reminder that our marketing team is looking for your
particip
planning to have new mainline cut off somewhere in May.
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list -- nginx@nginx.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nginx-le...@nginx.org
rg/mailman/listinfo/nginx
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
bsdfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/TLS-Offload-in-the-Kernel.pdf
Hope you will enjoy it.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
21 14:43, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On behalf of our marketing team I'd like to invite you, NGINX community
> members, users and developers, to participate in the NGINX Annual
> Community Survey.
>
> There are 20 questions there. It will take around 10 minutes of
ites/nginx/SurveyResponse?at=1I0025DXE6KKG8JCV1KHEZ8U6WNP8QI5ONSB
Upon completion, you will receive an exclusive 90% discount code for the
NGINX swag store.
Thank you for helping shape the future of NGINX.
Regards,
NGINX team
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx ma
Hi,
Liam Crilly just published recently a good summary where we are with the
QUIC and HTTP/3 implementation for nginx and our short term plans:
https://www.nginx.com/blog/our-roadmap-quic-http-3-support-nginx/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing
Brilliant!
Big thanks to everyone who contributed code, time and energy into this release.
-- Maxim Konovalov
> 15 июня 2021 г., в 20:14, Dmitry Volyntsev написал(а):
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm glad to announce a new release of NGINX JavaScript module (njs).
>
> This
On 04.06.2021 18:44, babu vel wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> It's not in upstream block. It's in server block. Please refer code snip
> below.
>
[...]
Yes, I missed the line numbers in your snippet.
Maxim D.'s has better explanation of what is go
lient_cert_auth;
> #
>
[...]
You cannot really use this directive in the upstream block, see
http://nginx.org/r/grpc_pass
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Which is the defacto hardening guide for securing Nginx rules apart from the
> CIS published ones?
>
I'd additionally take a look at Yandex's Gixy, nginx config scanner:
https://github.com/yandex/gixy
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing
=icon
>> => text://txt.textprotocol.org/license.txt rel=license CC0-1.0
>>
>> —
>> 🆃🆇🆃
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/textprotocol/publictext
>> [2] http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html
>> [3] https://textprotocol.org
>&g
s the pricing? Is Amplify supported at all?
>
> Thanks.
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
le or mainline for Production environment?
>
[...]
We published a blog post on this topic while ago:
https://www.nginx.com/blog/nginx-1-6-1-7-released/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 04.05.2020 17:45, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:54 PM Maxim Konovalov <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On 04.05.2020 11:26, Flinou wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I know tha
l ?
>
Yes, we are planning to have 1.19.0 somewhere in May (not listed in trac
yet).
What you see in trac is for 1.19 mainline "branch".
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
do some tuning besides upgrade to an appropriate version
> I guess. Can anyone help to suggest/recommend tuning to minimize the
> errors or rather not to have them at all?
>
What I can recommend is to upgrade nginx 1.12 to the most recent 1.17
version (i.e. 1.17.8). We added tons o
support with this issue.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 16/05/2019 16:51, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16/05/2019 16:46, Brandon Mallory wrote:
>> This is a very busy server and tried to push our programming
>> department to move to persistent connections, they feel that it
>> could be a security issue if dealing
/haproxy-high-mysql-request-rate-and-tcp-source-port-exhaustion/
> *
Nothing wrong with nginx in this scenario:
https://www.nginx.com/blog/overcoming-ephemeral-port-exhaustion-nginx-plus/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
t-server-return-nginx-plus-transparent-proxy/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
9 though.
We'll be grateful for more information about your specific usage,
brief overview, what kind of backends you use etc.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
ync. That allows you to do a lot of interesting stuff,
> like in this example where two subrequests are run in parallel:
> http://nginx.org/en/docs/njs/examples.html#fast_response
>
Some additional stuff to this topic
https://github.com/nginxinc/nginx-openid-connect
--
Maxim Konovalo
On 28/08/2018 19:37, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As some of you probably know we are doing a conference in Atlanta in
> October 8 - 11 this year. You can find its full agenda here:
>
> https://www.nginx.com/nginxconf/2018/agenda/
>
[...]
Here is a channel where you
ioned. Hopefully not, check for this comment from Andrey
https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/issues/1697#issuecomment-382741141
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
dd-module=../modsecurity-2.9.2/nginx/modsecurity
> --with-cc-opt=-fno-optimize-sibling-calls
>
>
[...]
modsecurity-2.9.2 is a culprit. Try to remove it from your build or
use modsec-3 instead
https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/tree/v3/master
--
Maxim Konovalov
_
...@palvelin.fi
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
nginx-plus support with your inquiry.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
y we have an experimental support and this experiment
almost stalled years ago.
In the same time we heard about many cases when people use nginx for
Windows in production[*].
* Definition of "production" may vary significantly.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
variable in stream which
> supports hostname i am connecting.
>
This is simple not possible. TCP doesn't have any signs of the
original domain name that was used for connect(2) on the client side.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
2 release is anticipated this week.
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
't see this mentioned in the release notes?
>
You are probably talking about nginx-unit project, right?
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
option available
at this time.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
; from my upstream config. I was trying without the
> 64k.
>
>
> On 27/04/2018 19:36, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> If you are nginx-plus customer it makes sense to open a support ticket.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Maxim
>>
>
Hi Matthew,
If you are nginx-plus customer it makes sense to open a support ticket.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
gt; issues that might prevent memory from being returned to the system?
>
Did you read Maxim Dounin's comment about OpenSSL freelists issue?
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2018-March/055869.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mail
we just
establish a connection without it.
Tested with grpc-c++ and grpc-go.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 07/03/2018 14:38, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via nginx wrote:
[...]
> This looks *very good*, thanks for your time!
Thanks for your testing, Wiktor.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
eal if in Poland) beer for adding this.
> :)
>
Just wonder, how do you use this info in http? Is it useful for you?
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
customer it makes sense to open a
support ticket with your questions.
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 15/02/2018 14:50, Akhil Dangore wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> Is there any to distinguish between nginx and nginx plus except
> "version check"(nginx -v) ?
>
Yes, there is. This is -plus:
$ nginx -v
nginx version: nginx/1.13.7 (nginx-*plus*-r14
about the progress of releasing the official feature? And is
> it being supported in Nginx Plus?
>
have you tested the patch? Any feedback?
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
pp/conf:4>
>
>
> This is my version:
>
> nginx version: nginx/1.12.2
>
>
> What do I make wrong? Since version 1.9.2 this option should be
> possible.
>
It is a part of paid version. From nginx.org/r/ntlm:
"This directive
t;fancy":"brick dust"},
> {"name":"blue","fancy":"sea spray"}]}';
>>> var my_object = JSON.parse(my_data);
>>> my_object.colors[1].fancy;
> sea spray
>>>
>
>
> I found this in
line in production.
--
Maxim Konovalov
"I'm not a software developer, but it doesn't seem as rocket
science"
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
ss source to compile dynamic modules for nginx-plus.
https://www.nginx.com/blog/compiling-dynamic-modules-nginx-plus/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
/www.nginx.com/resources/admin-guide/nginx-plus-modsecurity-waf-installation-logging/
https://www.nginx.com/blog/compiling-and-installing-modsecurity-for-open-source-nginx/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
2.168.183.20:389>""
>
>
> Any ideas?
Out of the blue: this is your local packet filter/firewall rules.
By the way, it makes sense to approach nginx-plus support channel
with such questions.
Best regards,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
work metrics for any obvious limits.
Also, it makes sense to read the following great slides about udp
perf tuning from Toshiaki Makita from NTT:
http://textlab.io/doc/15478046/boost-udp-transaction-performance
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
ngin
ws, our congratulations!
We wish you and all your team success with your project.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
'd suggest to approach -plus support channel. You can open a
support ticket just by forwarding this email.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 20/04/2017 17:41, Kees Bos wrote:
> On do, 2017-04-20 at 17:12 +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>> Hi Kees,
>>
>> On 20/04/2017 17:06, Kees Bos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Does someone have experience with nginx-mail and the proxy
&
It doesn't. There were no plans for that basically because nobody
asked before.
What's your backend software which supports proxy proto?
Thanks,
Maxim
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
ives the
> HTTP messages, it will parse the message and then put to those registerd TCP
> clients. Any idea how can this be done.
> Thanks, Santos
>
I'd check if nchan module suits your needs.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx m
ommunication has been maintained and nor is
> this communication free of viruses, interceptions or
> interference".'. If the disclaimer can't be applied, attach the
> message to a new disclaimer message.
>
>
>
> ___
sockets) and the hash slot could
> get out of balance
> over time.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>> On 3/7/17 10:50 PM, larsg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we are operating native nginx 1.8.1 on RHEL as a reverse proxy.
>>&
s? Or generally: to overcome the 64k problem?
>
We ever wrote a blog post for you!
https://www.nginx.com/blog/overcoming-ephemeral-port-exhaustion-nginx-plus/
As a side note: I'd really encourage all of you to add our blog rss
to your feeds. While there is some
t;>>> After all, they are persistent (hence the large number of connections).
>>>>
>>>> Why can’t you (OP) do the upgrade to 1.10? I thought it’s the only
>>>> „supported" version anyway?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> nginx mailing list
>>>> nginx@nginx.org
>>>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>> ___
>>> nginx mailing list
>>> nginx@nginx.org
>>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>>
>> ___
>> nginx mailing list
>> nginx@nginx.org
>> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hello,
On 1/13/17 10:46 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On 1/13/17 12:51 PM, nginxsantos wrote:
>> Thanks Maxim.
>> I am looking for a scenario to load balance the LWM2M server (my backend
>> servers would be LWM2M Servers). I am thinking of using the Nginx UDP
>> loadbal
; https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,264913,272170#msg-272170
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
UDP. So, I was thinking if I could offload the DTLS traffic here.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
OK, thanks for sharing this.
Indeed, we do have this item in the stream module roadmap. I wouldn't
promise any ETA for this specific feature, still need to figure out
the demand for it from the co
On 1/12/17 2:30 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/12/17 2:26 PM, nginxsantos wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does the opensource Nginx support DTLS offloading when acting as an UDP
>> loadbalancer?
>>
> It doesn't.
>
Btw, it would be useful fo
Hello,
On 1/12/17 2:26 PM, nginxsantos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does the opensource Nginx support DTLS offloading when acting as an UDP
> loadbalancer?
>
It doesn't.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailm
te-new-sendfile2-to-freebsd/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
#x27;t see the binary header preamble. Can
> someone confirm?
>
> https://thomas.glanzmann.de/tmp/nginx.pcap
>
Yes, that's right -- no support for the proxy proto v2.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
time from the
> client to the server on tcp layer.
> and what about the rttvar, snd_cwnd and rcv_space?
>
I would suggest to check any tcp 101c-like book for the explanation.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
:22
>
> I also tried adding a log_format section in the event that was required. Any
> advice/suggestions welcome.
>
You are probably using an old version of nginx --
ngx_stream_log_module was added in nginx-1.11.4.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
...]
Yes, right, partially because HTTP/2 push was never "the primary
boost" for HTTP/2 but I agree that different people at different
time can have very different ideas about the same thing.
I'd also encourage to read the comments in this blog post.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
ted.
> Not plus vs community. Are there any plans on releasing the server
> push feature for the community version?
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Maxim Konovalov <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
> Andrei,
>
> On 11/8/16 6:53 PM, Andrei wrote:
&g
if not some
> extraordinary delays with this feature as well considering it's
> marketing appeal and profit. You're better off doing like
> CloudFlare, and investing in some dev time if you want push
> support in the community version any time soon.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Maxim Konovalov <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
> On 8/22/16 8:30 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > On 8/22/16 8:23 PM, Richard Stanway wrote:
> >> See https://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html#stable
> <https://n
On 8/22/16 8:30 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On 8/22/16 8:23 PM, Richard Stanway wrote:
>> See https://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html#stable
>>
>> PGP key links are hard coded to http URLs:
>>
>>
>> For Debian/Ubuntu, in order to authenticate the
On 8/23/16 4:15 PM, B.R. wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Maxim Konovalov
> mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
> On 8/22/16 7:41 PM, B.R. wrote:
> > In 2016, stating that content served over HTTP is 'secure' blows my
> > mind and kill
pt
> program keyring with the following command:
>
>
Yes, I see. It should be fixed. Thanks.
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Maxim Konovalov <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
> On 8/22/16 8:15 PM, Richard Stanway wrote:
> > Could you at least fi
On 8/22/16 8:15 PM, Richard Stanway wrote:
> Could you at least fix the https download page, so it doesn't
> directly link to a HTTP PGP key?
>
It works correctly: https://nginx.org/en/download.html
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Maxim Konovalov <mailto:ma...@nginx.com&
cal reasons.
>
> 2. Don't waste resources on encryption, and thus save our
> planet.
>
> Please, don't be a TLS despot and let people to have a
> choice to use encryption
> or not.
>
> I think the situation when
/mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
> <http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
Join us at nginx.conf, Sept. 7-9, Austin, TX: http://nginx.com/nginxconf
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hi Dewangga,
On 7/28/16 10:31 AM, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've tried to build nginx 1.11.3 with --with-stream module parameter,
> but, attached below:
>
[...]
That was already fixed.
As a workaround you can add "--with-stream_ssl_module" to y
list
> nginx@nginx.org <mailto:nginx@nginx.org>
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
>
>
>
> _______
> nginx mailing list
> nginx@nginx.org
> http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
>
-
.conf:
+
+worker_processes 1;
+pid logs/nginx.pid;
+
+events {
+worker_connections 256;
+}
+
+stream {
+# include JavaScript file
+js_include js-stream.js;
+
+server {
+listen 8000;
+
+ # create $foo and $bar variables and set JavaScript
tion.
>
Not sure I understand your request.
For tcp nginx balances new connections based on the configured load
balancing discipline (rr by default).
> Frank
>
> On Thursday, June 23, 2016, Maxim Konovalov <mailto:ma...@nginx.com>> wrote:
>
> On 6/23/
e behaviour though:
https://www.nginx.com/resources/admin-guide/tcp-load-balancing/#hash
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
ll route TCP calls to a single host:port to different host:port combos
> based on the hostname held in the SNI information.
>
Currently the stream (tcp/udp lb) module misses this feature.
However, we do have it in the short-term roadmap and hope to have it
implemented more or less soon.
-
On 6/6/16 1:00 PM, A. Schulze wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using horde and observe similar errors since some weeks.
> Unsure if the same problem would be the reason.
>
> Maxim Konovalov:
>> It was fixed in 1.11.0 two weeks ago.
>
> I found one patch
On 6/6/16 10:53 AM, ZaneCEO wrote:
> Thank you very much!! At least now I know what's going on! Let's wait for a
> patch...
>
It was fixed in 1.11.0 two weeks ago.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http:
encourage use to click on that website
> link.)
>
Actually, a number of such complains is still surprisingly low.
> I think another mistake is to have the error page indicate the rev
> of nginx. That is an easy way for someone to spot a vulnerable rev
> of the nginx on a
indly clarify?
>
There are no differences between -plus and -oss in this area -- both
do support TLS termination in the stream module.
Yes, you are right, you need "--with-stream_ssl_module" configure flag.
You can find more information about our nginx-oss packages that we
resses in nginx
> (not Nginx Plus).
The blog post I sent has nothing -plus specific in this area.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
available solutions are:
>
> - use UNIX domain sockets (this works when you have everything on
> a single host);
>
> - add more local addresses on nginx side and use proxy_bind to
> balance users between these addresses.
>
+
https://www.nginx.com/blog/overcoming-ephemer
t;worker_processes auto".
http://nginx.org/r/worker_processes
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
oesn't come from nginx.org.
If you built your own package or compiled nginx from the nginx.org
sources you are safe with 1.8.1.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
ble or we can move
> forward with higher one ?
>
>
> Any help will be appreciated!
>
Does it help?
https://alas.aws.amazon.com/ALAS-2016-655.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
//mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-devel/2016-March/008012.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo