Help with: no resolver defined to resolve upstream-name

2016-08-04 Thread Ze Claudio Pastore
Hello, (Short version: what could cause nginx to try to resolve a name used as the upstream backend configured name? Long version follows in the body of the message). I have a weird problem, which might be something simple I am missing, I searched the archives and read the documentation twice and

Re: Broken pipe while sending request to upstream

2013-09-20 Thread Claudio
Hello Maxim, thanks a lot for your explanation. I've (kind off) solved the problem for now. I was testing with another proxy in between nginx and the Jetty server to see whether that would behave differently. I just used Twitter's finagle, which is based on Netty and got a few error messages like

Re: Broken pipe while sending request to upstream

2013-09-17 Thread Claudio
Hi Maxim. Maxim Dounin Wrote: --- > As long as a connection is closed before nginx is able to get a > response - it looks like a problem in your backend. Normally such > connections need lingering close to make sure a client has a chance > to

Broken pipe while sending request to upstream

2013-09-17 Thread Claudio
Hi. I've set up nginx as a proxy for a jetty service. Works nicely, most of the time, except ... when issuing a (somewhat) larger POST request to some entity which is protected by HTTP Basic access authentication. The web app responds with a 401 immediately, probably closing the connection right