On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:15 AM Reinis Rozitis wrote:
> > How? The presentation does not cover that.
>
> You shouldn't stick to a single youtube video.
>
This is the only video that I found that covers HLS. I also read the module
documentation.
> And it can't be a simple HTTP
>
> It is.
> Even
> How? The presentation does not cover that.
You shouldn't stick to a single youtube video.
> And it can't be a simple HTTP
It is.
Even the name HLS stands for "HTTP Live Streaming".
> , because as you said yourself, with HLS I would just end up with a cached
> playlist and bunch of useless
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:41 PM Reinis Rozitis wrote:
> > How would that work?
> > From the presentation on RTMP it looks like that nginx is just serving
> cached VODs instead of the actual stream.
>
> RTMP and HLS are two different streaming technologies.
> HLS just consists of a playlist (.m3u
> How would that work?
> From the presentation on RTMP it looks like that nginx is just serving cached
> VODs instead of the actual stream.
RTMP and HLS are two different streaming technologies.
HLS just consists of a playlist (.m3u8) file (usually the player reads it by
continuously making htt
How would that work?
>From the presentation on RTMP it looks like that nginx is just serving
cached VODs instead of the actual stream.
And even if it can actually proxy the requests (which I doubt), it can't be
configured dynamically.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:20 PM Reinis Rozitis wrote:
> > OK
> OK, after doing more research myself I'm pretty sure that nginx can't proxy
> HLS streams.
There is nothing special about HLS it is just simple http requests which nginx
can serve/proxy just fine.
What were the issues you have encountered?
rr
__
From: nginx [mailto:nginx-boun...@nginx.org] On Behalf Of Šimon Tóth
Sent: otrdiena, 2021. gada 13. jūlijs 20:54
To: nginx@nginx.org
Subject: Re: Using nginx as a HLS reverse proxy with Envoy?
OK, after doing more research myself I'm pretty sure that nginx can't proxy HLS
streams.
It
OK, after doing more research myself I'm pretty sure that nginx can't proxy
HLS streams.
It can proxy (pull) RTMP streams, however if I understand it correctly,
these streams have to be statically configured in configs (which is not my
use case).
--
Simon Toth
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:34 AM Š
Hi Vladimir,
Sure I'll share all the information.
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:44 PM Vladimir Homutov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:29:15PM +0530, Raminda Subashana wrote:
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > Just tested nginx-quic release and there is a performance issue. I
> compared
> > it with
Hi Vladimir,
Within the main users of HTTP/3 we are seeing an uptick in users doing
long lived connections and users using previously niche features (such
as server push) leading to an expectation of near indefinite session
life (and websocket isnt yet available for http/3).
Basically application
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:55:14PM +1000, Mathew Heard wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Really interesting read.
>
> Do you have any plans for resolving the SIGHUP causes session closure
> issues that currently exist with nginx-quic? The closure of long lived
> connections has been a thorn in the side of peo
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:29:15PM +0530, Raminda Subashana wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Just tested nginx-quic release and there is a performance issue. I compared
> it with Cloudflare quic experimental release which is based on nginx 1.16.
>
> It is almost 3 times slower than 1.16. Below config worked
Hi Maxim,
does Nginx have plans to adopt BBR as congestion control when using QUIC ?
Regards,
Marcin Wanat
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:15 AM Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Liam Crilly just published recently a good summary where we are with the
> QUIC and HTTP/3 implementation for nginx and o
Hi Maxim,
Just tested nginx-quic release and there is a performance issue. I compared
it with Cloudflare quic experimental release which is based on nginx 1.16.
It is almost 3 times slower than 1.16. Below config worked for me and it
never advertised h3-29. if you have specific config file to tes
Hi Maxim,
Really interesting post, can I publish this on my personal blog, is it
legal?
Thanks & Regards,
Raminda
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:25 PM Mathew Heard wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Really interesting read.
>
> Do you have any plans for resolving the SIGHUP causes session closure
> issues that
Hi Maxim,
Really interesting read.
Do you have any plans for resolving the SIGHUP causes session closure
issues that currently exist with nginx-quic? The closure of long lived
connections has been a thorn in the side of people doing HTTP/1.1 web
sockets (and probably HTTP/2 push) for many years.
Hi,
Liam Crilly just published recently a good summary where we are with the
QUIC and HTTP/3 implementation for nginx and our short term plans:
https://www.nginx.com/blog/our-roadmap-quic-http-3-support-nginx/
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
nginx mailing list
17 matches
Mail list logo