Re: $ssl_protocol in nodejs POST requests after 1.9.4

2021-05-08 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 09:16:39PM +0300, Reinis Rozitis wrote: > > Thanks for the report, it looks like this change broke things: > > > > changeset: 7738:554c6ae25ffc > > > > The only fix I can think of is to rewrite the lingering close so it will > happen after the request is logged.

RE: $ssl_protocol in nodejs POST requests after 1.9.4

2021-05-08 Thread Reinis Rozitis
> Thanks for the report, it looks like this change broke things: > > changeset: 7738:554c6ae25ffc > > The only fix I can think of is to rewrite the lingering close so it will happen after the request is logged. Thkx Maxim for finding the cause. I suppose that this is considered a bug then? If

Re: $ssl_protocol in nodejs POST requests after 1.9.4

2021-05-08 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 07:33:07PM +0300, Reinis Rozitis wrote: > Hello. > I have a strange issue where for a POST request having any form data Nginx > after version 1.9.4 doesn't log $ssl_protocol (or any other $ssl_*) > variable. > > > I have a configured custom accesslog: > > log_for

$ssl_protocol in nodejs POST requests after 1.9.4

2021-05-08 Thread Reinis Rozitis
Hello. I have a strange issue where for a POST request having any form data Nginx after version 1.9.4 doesn't log $ssl_protocol (or any other $ssl_*) variable. I have a configured custom accesslog: log_format main '... $ssl_protocol $ssl_cipher $server_port'; A simple script ( for example from

Re: upgrading binary failed - execve - too long argument list

2021-05-08 Thread Charlie Kilo
Thanks Maxim for further explaining! We do listen to a huge number of IPs with tons of traffic and huge spikes on them. We really need to avoid any type of congestion, therefore the reuseport. While many of the ip:port combos are simply there for failover purposes and actually aren't "in use", I