Re: proxy_cache_path 'inactive' vs http cache-control / expires headers?

2020-04-03 Thread Roger Fischer
Thanks, Maxim, for correcting my misunderstanding. With what frequency is the cache manger run? Roger > On Apr 3, 2020, at 9:26 AM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > Hello! > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:33:43AM -0700, Roger Fischer wrote: > >>> You can just set the inactive time longer than your poss

Re: proxy_cache_path 'inactive' vs http cache-control / expires headers?

2020-04-03 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:33:43AM -0700, Roger Fischer wrote: > > You can just set the inactive time longer than your possible maximum expire > > time for the objects then the cache manager won't purge the cache files > > even the object is still valid but not accessed. > > That may o

Re: proxy_cache_path 'inactive' vs http cache-control / expires headers?

2020-04-03 Thread Roger Fischer
> You can just set the inactive time longer than your possible maximum expire > time for the objects then the cache manager won't purge the cache files even > the object is still valid but not accessed. That may only have a small impact. As far as I understand: NGINX will remove an item only

Re: (SSL: error:1409441A:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert decode error:SSL alert number 50) while reading response header from upstream

2020-04-03 Thread Liam Moncur
It seems to related to apache set ups on the origin that were running openssl 1.1.1e since the upgrade to 1.1.1f it seems better and the SSL_read errors are gone. https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11381#issuecomment-607732081 Liam Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message

Re: aarch64 packages for other Linux flavors

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Konstantin, On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:31 PM Konstantin Pavlov wrote: > Hello, > > 10.03.2020 15:50, Emilio Fernandes wrote: > > Hi Konstantin, > > Thanks for your interest in our packages! > > > > By CentOS, do you want/need packages built for 8? Asking because I > > believe 7 is

Re: (SSL: error:1409441A:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert decode error:SSL alert number 50) while reading response header from upstream

2020-04-03 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 01:26:02PM +, Liam Moncur wrote: > Hey, > I am seeing an issue where nginx seems to get stuck in a loop soon after the > above error. From the debug I am seeing: > > 2020/04/02 14:09:10 [error] 12875#12875: *338 SSL_read() failed (SSL: > error:1409441A:SSL ro