Re: TLS 1.3 not offered and downgraded to a weaker protocol

Run openssl versionThe problem is openssl is too old for TLS 1.3 using Centos 7.You might want to read this:https://forums.centos.org/viewtopic.php?t=71848I have seen threads on building openssl so that you can support tls 1.3 on Centos 7. The trouble is once you build something it is your problem

TLS 1.3 not offered and downgraded to a weaker protocol

Hi, I am running nginx version: nginx/1.16.1 on CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core). I have configured *ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3*; in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf. #nginx -t nginx: the configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf syntax is ok nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test is succ

Re: Prevent direct access to files but allow download from site

I would generally say this is not possible in the way you describe it. There are two ways, however, this could be implemented: 1. You use one-time links to content files: all content retrieval URLs will get a parameter expires=X (how long the link should be valid) and a signature (e.g., an HMAC wi

Re: Prevent direct access to files but allow download from site

* MAXMAXarena: > what do you mean by "mutually exclusive"? I am assuming you have looked up the definition, so I'm not sure in what way the term could be be misunderstood? -Ralph ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/l

Re: Prevent direct access to files but allow download from site

Answers intermixed below. On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:23:15 -0400 "MAXMAXarena" wrote: > Hello @Ralph Seichter, > what do you mean by "mutually exclusive"? > As for the tools I mentioned, it was just an example. > Are you telling me I can't solve this problem? > > > Hello @garic, > thanks for this

Re: Prevent direct access to files but allow download from site

Hello @Ralph Seichter, what do you mean by "mutually exclusive"? As for the tools I mentioned, it was just an example. Are you telling me I can't solve this problem? Hello @garic, thanks for this answer, it made me understand some things. But I don't think I understand everything you suggest to m

Re: Prevent direct access to files but allow download from site

You could make it harder to pass around the URL if it is dynamic. That is make the url session related. You can do a search on "uncrawlable" and then exactly the opposite of what they suggest. That is most people want to be crawled, so their advice is backwards. One thing to watch out for is

Re: Sub-Filter auf SignalR ASP.NET Core Hub

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 12:56:33PM +0100, s.schabb...@fluent-software.de wrote: Hi there, > In the Access log I see an 404 Error, but don’t know how to handle them: > > 192.168.7.242 - - [09/Mar/2020:11:38:42 +0100] "GET > /webui/hub?id=a6T9oscwfbe-l0CRzOvCtw HTTP/1.1" 200 80 > "https://helite

Re: Webdav error accessing with Finder

On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 07:53:41AM -0500, atomino wrote: Hi there, > I am trying to acces the folder with Osx using Finder , > after authentication with the right password it will respond > with a message box : > ...translation > An error occurred during the connection to the server "xxx.i

Re: Prevent direct access to files but allow download from site

* MAXMAXarena: > I want to be able to download a file from the site's html tag [...] > But do not allow direct access and download, using the browser or > other tools such as curl or wget. Public access and restricted access are mutually exclusive. It also makes nearly no difference what utility

Prevent direct access to files but allow download from site

Good evening, I would like to block direct access to files in a folder on my site, but allow downloading from the site. Specifically, I want to be able to download a file from the site's html tag: Download TXT But do not allow direct access and download, using the browser or other tools such a