Re: Monitoring http returns

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:17:14AM -0400, Peter Booth wrote: > There are some very good reasons for doing things in what sounds > like a heavy inefficient manner. I suspected, thanks for the explanations. > The first point is that there are some big differences between > application code /busine

Re: Monitoring http returns

Jeff, There are some very good reasons for doing things in what sounds like a heavy inefficient manner. The first point is that there are some big differences between application code/business logic and monitoring code: Business logic, or what your nginx instance is doing is what makes you mon

Nginx as reverse proxy for https traffic

I am trying to use Nginx as a reverse proxy in an environment where clients connects to my server (https://myserver:10443). I am trying to use Nginx as a reverse proxy so that client will connect to Nginx proxy and Nginx will forward all requests to backend server. The c

Re: Monitoring http returns

This module can get you started: https://github.com/gfrankliu/nginx-http-reqstat On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > I want to monitor nginx better: http returns (e.g., how many 500's, how > many 404's, how many 200's, etc.), as well as request rates, response > times, etc.

Monitoring http returns

I want to monitor nginx better: http returns (e.g., how many 500's, how many 404's, how many 200's, etc.), as well as request rates, response times, etc.  All the solutions I've found start with "set up something to watch and parse your logs, then ..." Here's one of the better examples of that:

Re: Upgradeing from stable to mainline via repo ?

Hi. Am 08.04.2018 um 15:09 schrieb Bob Smith via nginx: > Hi, > > I've currently got stable installed via the NGINX Centos 7 repo. > > Is there a "supported", seamless way to "upgrade" from stable to > mainline via the repo ?  Or do I have to go the nuclear option via > uninstall and re-install

Re: Why are my CGI scripts not executed like PHP ?

Hi, Am 06.04.2018 um 21:53 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > On 06.04.18 19:04, Richard Stanway wrote: > >> https://www.nginx.com/resources/wiki/start/topics/examples/fcgiwrap/ > > I altered my setup to use fcgiwrap. Since then, I keep getting "502 Bad > Gateway" errors, with log entries like this: > >

Re: More than 65K connections of a proxy on FreeBSD

This may well help: https://www.nginx.com/blog/overcoming-ephemeral-port-exhaustion-nginx-plus/ On 10/04/2018 13:54, Salikhov Dinislam wrote: Hello, On Linux, NINGX can have more than 65K connections to backends per one local address of a proxy (set via proxy_bind), as Linux support IP_BIND_ADD

Re: [nginx-announce] nginx-1.13.12

Hello Nginx users, Now available: Nginx 1.13.12 for Windows https://kevinworthington.com/nginxwin11312 (32-bit and 64-bit versions) These versions are to support legacy users who are already using Cygwin based builds of Nginx. Officially supported native Windows binaries are at nginx.org. Annou

nginx-1.13.12

Changes with nginx 1.13.12 10 Apr 2018 *) Bugfix: connections with gRPC backends might be closed unexpectedly when returning a large response. -- Maxim Dounin http://nginx.org/ ___ nginx mailing list ng

More than 65K connections of a proxy on FreeBSD

Hello, On Linux, NINGX can have more than 65K connections to backends per one local address of a proxy (set via proxy_bind), as Linux support IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT socket option. I wonder if it is possible to have more than 65K proxy connections on FreeBSD? And if yes, does NGINX support it? T

Re: nginScript question

On 13.07.2017 18:14, aledbf wrote: Thanks! Hi, I am glad to inform you that since njs-0.2.0 it is possible to create arbitrary http subrequests from js_content phase. Here you can find the subrequest API description: http://hg.nginx.org/njs/rev/750f7c6f071c Here you can find some usage