> 在 2018年2月21日，23:34，Vladimir Homutov 写道：
>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:44:00PM +0800, Wang Shanker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that you have introduced `ngx_event_udp_accept()`, which can
>> create a separate socket for receiving datagrams from a specific client.
>> I understand that it i
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:44:00PM +0800, Wang Shanker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that you have introduced `ngx_event_udp_accept()`, which can
> create a separate socket for receiving datagrams from a specific client.
> I understand that it is necessary for DTLS servers. However I wonder
> why it i
Hi,
I noticed that you have introduced `ngx_event_udp_accept()`, which can
create a separate socket for receiving datagrams from a specific client.
I understand that it is necessary for DTLS servers. However I wonder
why it is also called for normal udp servers.
For udp servers listening on a
Hi, of course. I'm implementing RFC8094, which is for transmitting dns
queries through DTLS. Nginx is used for offloading DTLS encryption and
the software behind nginx is bind9.
Cheers,
Miao Wang
> 在 2018年02月21日，22:12，Vladimir Homutov 写道：
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:47:37AM -0500, shankerwa
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:47:37AM -0500, shankerwangmiao wrote:
>
> I have tested this patch in my environment. Before the patch is applied,
> `tcp_nodelay off` needs to be placed in every `server` clause with DTLS
> enabled to work the problem around.
>
Hello,
can you please elaborate about your
Vladimir Homutov Wrote:
---
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:18:27PM +0800, Wang Shanker wrote:
> > Hi, Vladimir
> >
> > `ngx_stream_ssl_init_connection` trys to set tcp_nodelay on the
> given connection.
> > The following patch adds a test for the ty
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:18:27PM +0800, Wang Shanker wrote:
> Hi, Vladimir
>
> `ngx_stream_ssl_init_connection` trys to set tcp_nodelay on the given
> connection.
> The following patch adds a test for the type of connection before set.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Miao Wang
>
> diff --git a/src/stream/ngx_st
Hello all,
What is the best approach in relation to performance when i want to block a
fiew hundrets or a fiew thousands of ip addresses ?
I ofted read that ngx_http_geo_module is better for many ip addresses.
What it depends on?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,278699,
Thanks Maxim, how should I put all in one server block because I thought the
logic will be as follow:
mail {
auth_http127.0.0.1/auth.php;
imap_capabilities"IMAP4rev1" "UIDPLUS";
server {
listen 0.0.0.0:143;
Hello!
The "request" means send mail request on the SMTP/SMTPS connection.
The "performance result" means the speed per minutes for the mail sending.
So you're right about the following point.
> Most critical parts from
> performance point of view are your auth_http backend and your SMTP
> ba
Thank you for your reply!
I would like to authenticate each connection.
If I use Postfix for mail proxy, it authenticates each e-mail not for each
connection.
alexsamad Wrote:
---
> Silly question why not use postfix for this ?
>
>
> On 20 F
I was short of explanation.
I am testing as you say.
But I want to know the problem in advance when it comes to providing
services to actual users and when not.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,278691,278693#msg-278693
___
ngi
12 matches
Mail list logo
