thanks Ruslan just tested your committed fixes for this in master branch and
working nicely
https://community.centminmod.com/threads/hurray-http-2-server-push-for-nginx.11910/page-2#post-59602
:)
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,278481,278608#msg-278608
_
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Tom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has successfully masked ip addresses in nginx
> before they are written to a log file.
>
> I understand there are reasons why you would and would not do this.
>
> Anyway, my config so far, which I believe works for
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 08:48:11AM -0500, Andrzej Walas wrote:
> Thanks for answer. In logs I see couple logs like this:
> [alert] 11373#0: ignore long locked inactive cache entry
> dba676c7ebb90e210efc04d51aaa4858, count:11
This message indicate that the cache entry in question was
was l
Thanks for answer. In logs I see couple logs like this:
[alert] 11373#0: ignore long locked inactive cache entry
dba676c7ebb90e210efc04d51aaa4858, count:11
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,278589,278600#msg-278600
___
nginx mai
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:33:19AM -0500, Andrzej Walas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use nginx 1.12.2. I have settings like this:
> proxy_cache_path /ephemeral/nginx/cache levels=1:2
> keys_zone=proxy-cache:4000m max_size=40g inactive=1d;
> proxy_temp_path /ephemeral/ngin
To add one more thing. I mentioned that my testing failed. Exactly what was
failing is that the map{} block that worked and then stopped working was the
problem, the $nocache variable would always return the default value no matter
what I did.
So in a previous post the suggested code was
proxy_
Yes, I should have explained the problem up front. I made the wrong assumption
I was asking a simple question and quickly realized I was getting good answers
but my approach was likely flawed from the start.
We are using Nginx just as a cache mechanism across many custom DNS names. As a
result
Hi Akhil,
On 15/02/2018 15:32, Akhil Dangore wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
>
> I am looking for some alternate way.
>
> Does it stored any directory or file ?
>
I am not sure now if I understand your intentions fully now. Would
you mind to elaborate?
By the way, if you are -plus customer it makes sens
Hello Maxim,
I am looking for some alternate way.
Does it stored any directory or file ?
Regards,
Akhil Dangore
On 2/15/2018 5:23 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On 15/02/2018 14:50, Akhil Dangore wrote:
Hello Team,
Is there any to distinguish between nginx and nginx plus except
"version check"(
On 15/02/2018 14:50, Akhil Dangore wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> Is there any to distinguish between nginx and nginx plus except
> "version check"(nginx -v) ?
>
Yes, there is. This is -plus:
$ nginx -v
nginx version: nginx/1.13.7 (nginx-*plus*-r14-p1)
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
Hello Team,
Is there any to distinguish between nginx and nginx plus except "version
check"(nginx -v) ?
Below is output of ps aux command:
*ubuntu@ubuntu-VirtualBox:~/Documents$ ps aux | grep nginx**
**root 1436 0.0 0.0 43068 80 ? Ss Feb12 0:00 nginx:
master process /usr
Hi,
I use nginx 1.12.2. I have settings like this:
proxy_cache_path /ephemeral/nginx/cache levels=1:2
keys_zone=proxy-cache:4000m max_size=40g inactive=1d;
proxy_temp_path /ephemeral/nginx/tmp;
And I have two problems with this:
1. If during the download to the cache th
Hi All,
We are using nginx cluster to get lots of request.
All the nginx under ELB,
We want to limit the QPS requests by device name/id/mac/whatever
I found that i can do it with Limit upstream module for nginx, but i
wondering if there is better way to achieved the goal.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
13 matches
Mail list logo
