another attempt :
# configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf:
#Core Functionality
user nobody;
worker_processes 8;
pid/var/run/nginx.pid;
pcre_jit on;
error_log /var/log/nginx/error_log;
#error_log /home/abackup/debug.log debug;
worker_rlimit_nofile 30;
#Load Dynamic Modules
includ
I could not paste output of nginx -T, even truncating to 2500 lines instead
of 158000
I get :
Please shorten your messages, the body is too large.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,273274,273468#msg-273468
___
nginx mailing lis
@] BR via Nginx :
Idea coming right out of the blue: have you given a thought on compiling
nginx (+ gradually modules) with valgrind? You should know pretty quickly
if something is wrong.
Thanks for this idea which can really improve the eng process...
Brotli seems the main suspected issue
Ano
Am 06-04-2017 19:05, schrieb Maxim Dounin:
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:32:45AM -0400, JohnCarne wrote:
[...]
[...]
Indeed, we are all tired to do 3 upgrades /month
Note that the way you are asking others to help you is not likely
to attract many volunteers.
+1
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:18:02PM +0200, Michal Kralik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're facing super strange issues with nginx 1.10.3 (CentOS 7,
> 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64). Our config works ok, we get a lot of traffic,
> but every day a couple of requests (5-10) don't get processes correctly by
> a serv
Hi,
We're facing super strange issues with nginx 1.10.3 (CentOS 7,
3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64). Our config works ok, we get a lot of traffic,
but every day a couple of requests (5-10) don't get processes correctly by
a server directive with the defined server_name, but rather by a server
directive
Idea coming right out of the blue: have you given a thought on compiling
nginx (+ gradually modules) with valgrind? You should know pretty quickly
if something is wrong.
Note the slowdown, though. Might not be a good idea on production, or if
you do not secure some offload to somewhere else if i
Thank Sergey, for you response.
I have one more question. If I have multiple upstream server host names in
the upstream server block, then how can I specify the specific upstream
server host name to which the request is being proxied, in the
proxy_ssl_name directive?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http
Thanks for your feebacks. I do my best seriously to communicate what I can
!
We note this issue on very busy server only, it will be hard to remove all
modules on such busy server, and reconfig all, but not impossible. Anoop is
on the case on smallest servers, and succeed to see the issue at small
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:32:45AM -0400, JohnCarne wrote:
> cpanel stat generation cause thet nginx makes a lot of reload to grab new
> file descriptor... no issue on that
>
> Issue is nginx, I show you situation now with 2.58% used for 1 work, which
> is same value for others, but gloab
> cpanel stat generation cause thet nginx makes a lot of reload to grab new
> file descriptor... no issue on that
Even though this is off-topic - if you issue a lot of reloads during cPanel
stat generation, your hooks are configured wrong, since Apache in cPanel only
reloads *once* during the w
Thanks for info, Anoop will read this, he is subscribed
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,273274,273458#msg-273458
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On Thursday 06 April 2017 11:32:45 JohnCarne wrote:
> cpanel stat generation cause thet nginx makes a lot of reload to grab new
> file descriptor... no issue on that
>
[..]
JFYI, reloading nginx isn't required to reopen log files.
See for details: http://nginx.org/en/docs/control.html#logs
wbr
cpanel stat generation cause thet nginx makes a lot of reload to grab new
file descriptor... no issue on that
Issue is nginx, I show you situation now with 2.58% used for 1 work, which
is same value for others, but gloably, nginx uses now 2.58%, this number is
increasing slowly at the rythm of ngi
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:32:41PM -0400, JohnCarne wrote:
> We described it properly when opening ticket, I reformulate :
>
> Usually, 1 nginx worker process consumes 1.16-2% of RAM maximum on this
> server, and it remain stable.
> For some days after nginx upgrades, every overnight, dur
Thanks, I guess actual proxying is the only way out. I will try it out.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,273446,273454#msg-273454
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 06:45:23AM -0400, sachin.she...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to define multiple caches based on certain request headers (time
> stamp) so that we can put files modified in last 10 days on SSDs, last 30
> days on HDDs and so on. I understand that we could use
Dmitry S. Polyakov Wrote:
---
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017, 10:50 shahzaib mushtaq
> wrote:
>
> > >>With the controls sites have over the referrer header, it's not
> very
> > effective as an access control mechanism. You can use something like
> > http
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017, 10:50 shahzaib mushtaq wrote:
> >>With the controls sites have over the referrer header, it's not very
> effective as an access control mechanism. You can use something like
> http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_secure_link_module.html
> instead.
>
> We're also using Nginx
Hello There,
I had this same issue and fixed it by the following method.
For example in HTML :
That is what your media stream link would look like.
But if you use JavaScript like the following example :
window.onload = MediaReplacement()
function MediaReplacement() {
var _video =
"/file.mp4?
Hi,
We want to define multiple caches based on certain request headers (time
stamp) so that we can put files modified in last 10 days on SSDs, last 30
days on HDDs and so on. I understand that we could use map feature to pick a
cache dynamically which is good and works for us.
But when serving a
If a module is dynamic loadable has issue and if we do not load the module
, will it still cause the error ?
In the case above , ModSecurity-nginx was compiled as a dynamic module and
not loaded .
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:31 PM, JohnCarne
wrote:
> I let dev Anoop answer to you... he has a clue
I let dev Anoop answer to you... he has a clue about the issue :
https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity-nginx/issues/45
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,273274,273444#msg-273444
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http:/
Am 06-04-2017 07:14, schrieb JohnCarne:
It looks like i don't speak english properly to be understood, others
will
open a thread on this issue, and may be explain better
Well how about to remove the additionally modules and watch if the
memory issue still exists.
###
--add-dynamic-module=
>>With the controls sites have over the referrer header, it's not very
effective as an access control mechanism. You can use something like
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_secure_link_module.html
instead.
We're also using Nginx secure link module based on HASH + expiry but
somehow this secu
Hi,
Anyone ?
Regards.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:13 PM, shahzaib mushtaq
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sometimes we encounter Content mismatch error in browser on website &
> refreshing the page fix this issue. The full error is :
> http://prntscr.com/esp3jr
>
> Here is nginx.conf file : https://pastebin.com
Hello christian,
naxsi-contributor first
bad news first:
naxsi wouldnt work on websockets.
Any other security for websockets you have to implement yourself.
list of usefull reads:
- https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/websocket-security
-
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/48378/
thank you Maxim,
the resourse was saved to cache but was quickly expiring in the browser
causing a Cache-Control: no-cache header to be sent.
Sending something like
Cache-Control:
public,max-age=15,s-maxage=240;must-revalidate,stale-while-revalidate=240
together with Last-Modified/ETag from t
28 matches
Mail list logo
