Thx a lot ... I do understand better now.
In my nginx.conf I do have:
*
stream {
limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=straddr:10m;
upstream backendmail {
server email.domain.tld:448;
}
}
*
In my server.conf I do have:
*
server {
listen 448 ssl;
error_log
main context means it come directly in nginx.conf
http context means it should be put inside http{ }
server context means it should be in server { }
likewise..
You can search the directive like http://nginx.org/r/x_
For eg: http://nginx.org/r/stream
check the context where that directi
error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log info;
events {
worker_connections 1024;
}
stream {
upstream backend {
hash xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx consistent;
server email.domain.tld:448;
}
server {
listen 448;
proxy_connect_timeout 1s;
proxy_timeout 3s;
http://nginx.org/en/docs/stream/ngx_stream_core_module.html#stream
stream should be in the main context.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Thierry
wrote:
> proxy nginx[20076]: nginx: [emerg] "stream" directive is not allowed here
> in
> /etc/nginx/conf.d/reverse-proxy.conf:47
>
> Posted at Ngin
proxy nginx[20076]: nginx: [emerg] "stream" directive is not allowed here in
/etc/nginx/conf.d/reverse-proxy.conf:47
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,271891,271897#msg-271897
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailma
Hello, I don't find anything in Google about
snfnettest
Can you confirm that the name is OK?
Kind regards,
Oscar
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:02 PM, pbooth wrote:
> > Both NIC supports the speed of 1000Mb/s
>
> How do you know? Your kernel or NIC config might be limiting you.
>
> iperf, snfne
> Both NIC supports the speed of 1000Mb/s
How do you know? Your kernel or NIC config might be limiting you.
iperf, snfnettest, or etherate will show you the maximum possible
bandwidth at the TCP or IP layer.
If it's under 700 then you know to focus on the NIC and OS. If it's above
900 then the
Hello!
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:56:54PM +0300, Руслан Закиров wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:04:47PM +0300, Руслан Закиров wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > nginx 1.10.2 [1] running on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p7
> >
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:04:47PM +0300, Руслан Закиров wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > nginx 1.10.2 [1] running on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p7
> >
> > We have quite a lot of "upstream timed out" errors. For example:
> >
> > 2017/01/08 16:
stream {
limit_conn_zone $binary_remote_addr zone=straddr:10m;
upstream backendsmtp {
server smtp1.local:25;
server smtp2.local:25;
}
server {
listen 2025 ssl;
error_log /logging/stream_local_smtp.log debug;
ssl_certificate /nginx/crts/sdom.cert;
ssl_certificate_k
Dear,
I have a reverse-proxy in front of my two servers: web (apache2) and
email (nginx-iredmail).
The proxy-reverse is perfectly working with my web server running
Apache2, but I am not able to make it working for my email server.
The reverse-proxy and the email server are both running wi
Out of the box Linux isn't optimized for high speed networking - if you
google for linux and 1g or 10g you'll find a ton of pages about
configuration changes.
I think you'll want to do something like:
ifconfig eth0 txqueuelen 1
ethtool -G eth0 rx 4096 tx 4096
ip route | while read x; do ip ro
FYI, benchmark mentioned in the video.
https://github.com/wg/wrk
Wouldn't a number of test machine ls on the Internet make more sense than
flogging nginx locally on your network?
With VPS time being sold by the hour, seems to me you should get one VPS tester
running acceptably, then clone a do
Hello!
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:01:40AM +0800, he.hailo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> I observe that the nginx runs with no error if there are
> duplicate listen ports configured in the http server block or
> stream server block.
>
> is this behavior as expected? and if a request comes at such a
>
Hello!
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 05:04:47PM +0300, Руслан Закиров wrote:
> Hello,
>
> nginx 1.10.2 [1] running on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p7
>
> We have quite a lot of "upstream timed out" errors. For example:
>
> 2017/01/08 16:20:54 [error] 82154#0: *494223064 upstream timed out (60:
> Operation t
On Friday 06 January 2017 10:24:06 MrFastDie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the last days I played a little with the NGINX settings and the tcp stack to
> test the best performance. I used direct connection between my testing
> machine and my server using a cat5e cable.
> My nginx.conf can be found at pasteb
I could never find an answer to this problem so I just reinstalled Nextcloud
using Apache instead on Nginx and it works flawlessly. Not sure what could
have caused Nginx to not work properly in this application but after trying
for a week and not getting an answer from the Nginx community, I had to
Thank you, Richard!
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,228856,271874#msg-271874
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Yes I do have RAM of size : 1.5T and swap space of around 200G. It has been
observed that swap is not getting used in this case. But it seems either OS
is not clearing the RAM that fast or nginx is not able to control RAM as
mentioned in the nginx configuration file.
Could you please suggest what
Hi
Yes, use ngx.exec in lua
On 09/01/17 07:23, pavelvasev wrote:
Have you found a solution for this, Richard?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,228856,271867#msg-271867
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.ng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/01/2017 05:40, omkar_jadhav_20 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using nginx as webserver with nginx version: nginx/1.10.2. For
> faster access we have mounted cache of nginx of different
> application on RAM.But even after giving enough buffer of size ,
can someone please respond. Let me know if any additional information is
required.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,271842,271870#msg-271870
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
The OS of the server is debian 8, at my testing machine i'm using arch
linux. Both NIC supports the speed of 1000Mb/s the server got round about
600 Mb/s up and 13Mb/s down.
CJ Ess Wrote:
---
> Which OS? What NIC? You also have to consider the tr
23 matches
Mail list logo
