Hi B.R
Please find the nginx confiuration below that we are using. and any help
would be greatful.
nginx -V
=
nginx version: nginx/1.8.0
built with OpenSSL 1.0.2h-fips 3 May 2016
TLS SNI support enabled
configure arguments: --crossbuild=Linux::arm
--with-cc=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gc
looks like something what I'm looking for!
thanks a lot, starting my tests
br
L.
Łukasz Tasz
RTKW
2016-09-01 15:31 GMT+02:00 Maxim Dounin :
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:34:39PM +0200, Łukasz Tasz wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > since some time I'm using nginx as reverse proxy with caching f
Good day Maxim
Thank you for taking the time in your explanation.
Regards
Brent Clark
On 01/09/2016 15:25, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:43:55AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
I just implemented rate limiting.
Could someone please explain what
*42450 is / means
This
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:34:39PM +0200, Łukasz Tasz wrote:
> Hi all,
> since some time I'm using nginx as reverse proxy with caching for serving
> images files.
> looks pretty good since proxy is located per each location.
>
> but I noticed problematic behaviour, when cache is empty, an
Hello!
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:43:55AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
> I just implemented rate limiting.
>
> Could someone please explain what
>
> *42450 is / means
This is a connection number, also available as $connection.
> 109154#109154 is / means
This is nginx worker PID (also available
Hi all,
since some time I'm using nginx as reverse proxy with caching for serving
images files.
looks pretty good since proxy is located per each location.
but I noticed problematic behaviour, when cache is empty, and there will
pop-up a lot of requests at the same time, nginx don't understand tha
Good day Guys
I just implemented rate limiting.
Could someone please explain what
*42450 is / means
109154#109154 is / means
and what also
10.195 (I take it 10 is the size my bucket, but its the 195 I dont
understand)
Here is the log entry:
2016/09/01 10:06:29 [error] 109154#109154: *424
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:58:50PM +0800, Gwenole Gendrot wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've been using nginx 1.11.3 to test the UDP load balancing feature, using a
> "basic" configuration.
> The functionality is working out of the box, but a new socket will be
> created by the proxy for each packet