Hello,
I see that "Dual Certificate (RSA and ECC) support" is currently on the
roadmap for nginx 1.9, but is not listed as in progress.
Is this feature guaranteed to be in 1.9? Will this feature allow us to
serve a SHA-256 and SHA-1 cert at the same time?
Our platform is often used in developing
Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> Hello!
>
> You can find the detailed response to your original message here:
>
> http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2016-January/049734.html
>
> Unfortunately, forum interface is broken and is unable to show it
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:02:31AM -0500, jeeeff wrote:
> Anyone else noticed the same behavior?
>
> I wasn't sure if that kind of behavior was correct, but as I said the lock
> works properly and only one request get forwarded to the backend server when
> there is no cached item in the c
Anyone else noticed the same behavior?
I wasn't sure if that kind of behavior was correct, but as I said the lock
works properly and only one request get forwarded to the backend server when
there is no cached item in the cache (that is: the cache is empty), so to me
the behavior should be the sa
Thank you, that would explain the message. Ill check why the upstream
servers might not have been reachable.
All the best,
Armin
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,264368,264381#msg-264381
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 06:26:28AM -0500, abauer wrote:
> We are using nginx as a loadbalancer in front of docker containers. Most of
> the time this works without problems. But sometimes (~0.1% of the requests)
> the requests are sent to the server group name instead of one of the members
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 06:36:30AM -0500, kmg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm so happy that Stream feature is enabled from Nginx-1.9.x. Also I started
> to use this feature in my Testing environment which is running smoothly.
>
> But One thing I got struggled , is to block IP based on GeoIP country
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:38:15PM -0500, FSC wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I set up my reverse proxy to cache files stored at AWS S3. I want to
> minimize the amount of traffic generated at AWS.
>
> Many of the files are mp4s. Clients make GET requests with the range set. A
> video playe
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 02:28:07PM -0500, sirwiz wrote:
> I try to run Nginx, but i have error: eventfd() failed (38: Function not
> implemented)
>
> I found this patch (https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?29,258676,258685#REPLY)
> to 1.9.0, i cannot do diff so i do it manualy.
>
> So i fo
Hello!
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:00PM -0500, orglee wrote:
> Oh ok I'm dumb. :P
>
> Can I somehow specify those library paths to? I really would like to avoid
> compiling them into directory structure of my current system.
Refer to the library docs to find out how to compile them and
insta
Hi,
I'm so happy that Stream feature is enabled from Nginx-1.9.x. Also I started
to use this feature in my Testing environment which is running smoothly.
But One thing I got struggled , is to block IP based on GeoIP country as
like Server block. Does GeoIP blocking feature available in Stream blo
No idea how I missed that. Thank you very much!
Also for people that might find this thread later:
Adding the parameter "updating" to the directive "proxy_cache_use_stale" is
important as well if you want to minimize the traffic the origin server
generates.
proxy_cache_use_stale updating;
proxy
Hello,
We are using nginx as a loadbalancer in front of docker containers. Most of
the time this works without problems. But sometimes (~0.1% of the requests)
the requests are sent to the server group name instead of one of the members
of the servergroup.
upstream gateway {
server 127.0.0.1:
> also stated "In Linux (and most other Unix based systems) ports below 1024
> need to be opened using the root user. So you need to start NGINX as root
> which will open the port and then drop down to an unprivileged user for the
> port."
>
> Is there a way to achieve this?
Configure the user dir
@Daniel,
You were true on the side-note, sudo prefixed command for NGinx actions will
cause an serious threat. I missed the note...
@Andrew
also stated "In Linux (and most other Unix based systems) ports below 1024
need to be opened using the root user. So you need to start NGINX as root
which wi
I support this proposal. We need this functionality, too.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
https://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,238389,264364#msg-264364
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
16 matches
Mail list logo
