Hello!
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:06:57PM -0500, Kunal Pariani wrote:
> Hello,
> Am seeing an issue while sending HUP signal to nginx (for config reload) on
> Ubuntu14. It just kills the master process & doesn't start the new worker
> processes. The same works just fine on CentOS 6.6 64-bit
>
Thanks all devs who put Nginx together and made this awesome piece of work!
With it and freedns.afraid.org I was able to host my site from my home server.
--
Thiago Farina
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinf
Hello,
Am seeing an issue while sending HUP signal to nginx (for config reload) on
Ubuntu14. It just kills the master process & doesn't start the new worker
processes. The same works just fine on CentOS 6.6 64-bit
$ ps -eaf | grep nginx
zimbra 10860 1 0 16:05 ? 00:00:00 nginx: master process
Thank you.
Now I am proved to be a sub-rookie.
Idézem/Quoting Maxim Dounin :
Hello!
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:11:11PM +0200, Szépe Viktor wrote:
>Does $upstream_cache_status does the work?
>
>Disclaimer: I'm a newbie. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks. I don't use the http_upstream m
Hello!
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:11:11PM +0200, Szépe Viktor wrote:
> >Does $upstream_cache_status does the work?
> >
> >Disclaimer: I'm a newbie. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Thanks. I don't use the http_upstream module.
> It is a basic PHP-FPM setup.
As long as you use fastcgi, you ar
Does $upstream_cache_status does the work?
Disclaimer: I'm a newbie. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks. I don't use the http_upstream module.
It is a basic PHP-FPM setup.
Idézem/Quoting ryd994 :
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:04 PM Szépe Viktor wrote:
Could anyone comment on this?
Idéz