On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:04 PM Szépe Viktor wrote:
Could anyone comment on this?
Idézem/Quoting Szépe Viktor :
> Good morning!
>
> I'd like to add a X-Fastcgi-Cache header when there is a fastcgi
> cache hit, when the response is stored to or retrieved from the cache.
>
> add_header X-Fastcgi-
Hello!
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 04:55:34PM -0400, knofun wrote:
> Server is running really hot so investigating. Stub_status displays
> requests, but CPU data is 0.00 for all:
>
> http://pastebin.com/U0pLCBQ8
>
> I'm running 1.8.0 with php-fpm and fastcgi caching
The output in question is not f
Could anyone comment on this?
Idézem/Quoting Szépe Viktor :
Good morning!
I'd like to add a X-Fastcgi-Cache header when there is a fastcgi
cache hit, when the response is stored to or retrieved from the cache.
add_header X-Fastcgi-Cache 600;
Could you help me?
Thank you.
Szépe Vi
Server is running really hot so investigating. Stub_status displays
requests, but CPU data is 0.00 for all:
http://pastebin.com/U0pLCBQ8
I'm running 1.8.0 with php-fpm and fastcgi caching
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,259350,259350#msg-259350
> In my current setup I have nginx behind a load balancing router (OSPF)
> where each connection to the same address has about 16% chance of
> hitting the same server as the last time.
If you get your router to only hash source and destination IP instead of
5-tuple for the load-balancing, that
In my current setup I have nginx behind a load balancing router (OSPF)
where each connection to the same address has about 16% chance of hitting
the same server as the last time.
In a setup like that, does SSL session caching make any difference? I was
thinking it through this morning and I'm bett
Hello!
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:29:31AM -0400, CJ Ess wrote:
> In my current setup I have nginx behind a load balancing router (OSPF)
> where each connection to the same address has about 16% chance of hitting
> the same server as the last time.
>
> In a setup like that, does SSL session cachi
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:21:12PM +0100, Matthew O'Riordan wrote:
[...]
> > Your problem is in step (5). While you've started new nginx
> > workers to handle new requests in step (4), this doesn't guarantee
> > that old upstream servers are no longer needed.
>
> I realise that is the
Hello!
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:52:41AM +0200, Oliver Schrenk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we configured load balancing around 10 machines in 2 clusters
> using symbolic links to various configuration file. We change
> the symbolic link to a different file if we need to do
> maintenance on one of the c
Hi,
we configured load balancing around 10 machines in 2 clusters using symbolic
links to various configuration file. We change the symbolic link to a different
file if we need to do maintenance on one of the clusters and reload nginx. We
are building some automation around this and want to mak
Tested fine with ECC 256 bit and RSA 2048 bit SSL and chacha20_poly1305
https://community.centminmod.com/threads/nginx-and-libressl-alternative-to-openssl.3146/
:)
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,259325,259333#msg-259333
___
ng
11 matches
Mail list logo