You can get best baby carrier for babies upto 3 months old online. For
these baby carrier design look here
http://newborncarrier.edicy.co/blog/checklist-for-purchasing-baby-newborn-carrier.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
nginx mailing li
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 07:24:27PM +0200, Stefanita Rares Dumitrescu wrote:
>
> On 20/10/2014 07:46, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> >I always wonder why people think that hiding versions improves
> >security.
> >
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity
> >
> >
> Usually this is
for scanners/indexes of public services your might search for "shodan"
for the valid use of security trhough obscurity:
"My thoughts on this are that obscuring information is helpful to security
in many cases as it can force an attacker to generate more "noise" which can
be detected.
Where obsc
On 20/10/2014 07:46, Maxim Dounin wrote:
I always wonder why people think that hiding versions improves
security.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity
Usually this is done as a preventive measure against 0days if you're not
around to fix stuff for instance. automated scann
> I have a few users that are having issues with my website now that I
> disabled SSLv3. Turns out the only cipher that would/should work with
> XP/IE8 is TLS1.0: "TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA" (there are two RC4's
> that also work, but I understand that is really not recommended).
>
> Can an
Try this;
ssl_prefer_server_ciphers On;
ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2;
ssl_ciphers
ECDH+AESGCM:DH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:DH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:DH+AES:ECDH+3DES:DH+3DES:RSA+AESGCM:RSA+AES:RSA+3DES:!aNULL:!eNULL:!MD5:!DSS;
Works with IE7/xp, sslabs is ok with this as well.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
I have a few users that are having issues with my website now that I
disabled SSLv3. Turns out the only cipher that would/should work with
XP/IE8 is TLS1.0: "TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA" (there are two RC4's
that also work, but I understand that is really not recommended).
Can anyone tell m
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:37:51AM -0400, c0nw0nk wrote:
> Yeah sorry about that Maxim i don't actualy use the allow ip feature i
> accidently hashed out the #deny all; and this forum does not let us edit our
> posts.
This is because it's not a forum, it's a mailing list.
> Other than th
I just read on the Wiki why you missed out putting head in the limit_except
block.
"Allowing the GET method makes the HEAD method also allowed."
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,254125,254167#msg-254167
___
nginx mailing list
n
Yeah sorry about that Maxim i don't actualy use the allow ip feature i
accidently hashed out the #deny all; and this forum does not let us edit our
posts.
Other than that the following that you posted.
if ($request_method !~ ^(GET|HEAD|POST)$ ) {
return 444;
}
For nginx itself this is not needed
10 matches
Mail list logo