Re: Override Content-Type header with proxied requests

Hello, you can use many values on the map, take a look on its docs. One quickly example may be (not tested) map $uri $custom_content_type { default "text/html"; ~(.*\.json)$ "application/json"; } location ~ \.json$ { proxy_hide_header Content-Type; add_header Content-Typ

Re: Why cannot the same path for cache be used several times?

Hi, The key_zone is just the name of a shared memory area where some metadata about the cache entries will be saved. The files stored on the cache_path does not use the key_zone. They are different configurations to two different purposes. To do what you are imagining, the file stored on cache_p

NGINX redirection issue

Hello All, I am facing some issue regarding nginx redirection. I want to remove .html extension from all the html pages and all the index.html pages. For example 1. http://www.aaa.com/bbb/ccc.html should show the content of http://www.aaa.com/bbb/ccc.html but the URL should show http://www.aaa.c

Re: Override Content-Type header with proxied requests

Hello All, Can somebody answer this question? I am facing this issue from many days. --Manish Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,252360,252378#msg-252378 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/li

Re: Why cannot the same path for cache be used several times?

Thanks for your input Maxim. However either I still do not get the purpose of the zone key or I am missing something in the whole reasoning... Isn't it the zone key there to isolate requests from different sources and thus avoid collisions in the same cache path? The only case favorable for collis

Re: Why cannot the same path for cache be used several times?

Hello! On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:48:29PM +0200, B.R. wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:47 AM, itpp2012 wrote: > > > keys_zone is memory, the other a 'file' path, I could imagine a 'cachehash' > > used could overwrite the other. > > > > ​I thought of that​, but learning how variables are resol

Re: [PATCH] print format for nevents

Hello! On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:28:00PM -0400, crespin wrote: > Maxim Dounin Wrote: > --- > > Hello! > > > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:22:10AM -0400, crespin wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > nevents is an ngx_int_t, so the print format

Re: nginx-1.7.4

on Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:20:51 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:16:44AM -0400, Cole Tierney wrote: >> On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 15:19:43 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >>> On 8/6/14 3:15 PM, Cole Tierney wrote: Hello, Thanks for the update! Are there plans to update

Re: Why cannot the same path for cache be used several times?

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:47 AM, itpp2012 wrote: > keys_zone is memory, the other a 'file' path, I could imagine a 'cachehash' > used could overwrite the other. > ​I thought of that​, but learning how variables are resolved at request time, and knowing that configuration is parsed on HUP signal,

Re: [PATCH] print format for nevents

Maxim Dounin Wrote: --- > Hello! > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:22:10AM -0400, crespin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > nevents is an ngx_int_t, so the print format must be "%i". > > Both signed and unsigned ngx_[u]int_t has the same size, so that'

Re: [PATCH] print format for nevents

Hello! On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:22:10AM -0400, crespin wrote: > Hello, > > nevents is an ngx_int_t, so the print format must be "%i". Both signed and unsigned ngx_[u]int_t has the same size, so that's more about preferable representation of numbers, not about correctness of the code. In th

[PATCH] print format for nevents

Hello, nevents is an ngx_int_t, so the print format must be "%i". Regards, yves static ngx_int_t nevents; --- a/nginx-1.7.4/src/event/modules/ngx_poll_module.c +++ b/nginx-1.7.4/src/event/modules/ngx_poll_module.c @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ ngx_poll_del_event(ngx_event_t *ev, ngx_int_t event, n

Re: [ANN] Windows nginx 1.7.4.2 WhiteRabbit

c0nw0nk Wrote: --- > Also itpp2012 i don't know if you remember from the last time we > talked but would it be better or any difference for you to compile a > 64bit Nginx instead of a 32bit ? For new items/issues please open a new topic. 64bit b

Re: [ANN] Windows nginx 1.7.4.2 WhiteRabbit

Also itpp2012 i don't know if you remember from the last time we talked but would it be better or any difference for you to compile a 64bit Nginx instead of a 32bit ? Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,252064,252363#msg-252363 ___

Re: Why body filter not work

Hello! On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:58:16PM +0800, Jerry OELoo wrote: > Hi. > I just copy the code from Evan Miller's body filter. > http://www.evanmiller.org/nginx-modules-guide.html#filters-body, > however, In my browser I could not see inserted string () The chapter in question doesn't looks co

Override Content-Type header with proxied requests

Please refer this page http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,239473,252358#msg-252358 Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,252360,252360#msg-252360 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: nginx-1.7.4

Hello! On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:16:44AM -0400, Cole Tierney wrote: > On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 15:19:43 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > On 8/6/14 3:15 PM, Cole Tierney wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Thanks for the update! > >> > >> Are there plans to update the mercurial respository? I just tried p

Re: Override Content-Type header with proxied requests

Hello Appa, I am having the same issue. I want NGINX to serve all the json file from upstream as a content type of application/json.I tried with map just like you suggested but I am not able to figure out what should be inside map(That you have written below), Can you please suggest? map $upstrea

Re: nginx-1.7.4

On Wed, 06 Aug 2014 15:19:43 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On 8/6/14 3:15 PM, Cole Tierney wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Thanks for the update! >> >> Are there plans to update the mercurial respository? I just tried pulling >> changesets, recompiling, and I am still at 1.7.1. >> > You are doing some

Re: nginx-1.7.4

On 8/6/14 3:15 PM, Cole Tierney wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the update! > > Are there plans to update the mercurial respository? I just tried pulling > changesets, recompiling, and I am still at 1.7.1. > You are doing something wrong: $ hg -q clone http://hg.nginx.org/nginx tmp $ grep NGINX

php5-fpm with nginx not working

Hi All, Please I have installed nginx version 1.7.4 with the php5-fpm on debien wheezy. Work fine but php do not seem to be integrated properly with the " An error occurred." on the browser below my config from the default.conf file: # pass the PHP scripts to FastCGI server listening on 1

Re: nginx-1.7.4

Hello, Thanks for the update! Are there plans to update the mercurial respository? I just tried pulling changesets, recompiling, and I am still at 1.7.1. — Cole ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: ngx.shared_dict.get_keys usage

hmmm.. also you'd better to upgrade the openresty version. it' too old. :) -- smallfish http://chenxiaoyu.org On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Suraj Kumar wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Suraj Kumar > wrote: > >> When I do dict.get_keys(100), I see the following error in nginx >> e