All emails ending at the destination note the sender as the actual backend
and not nginx proxy. How can I force smtp outbound through nginx? I tried
smtp_bind_address = proxy.ip.addr in main.cf for postfix. And tried adding
an SNAT rule in iptables to route through the proxy with no luck. Any
advic
Lee we switched to using memcached for sessions and this helped, but still
seeing blocking, though less time.
If we open two tabs, in the first page fire an ajax request that takes 20+
seconds to run, then in the second tab refresh, the page blocks loading in
the second tab, but now instead of wai
Hi Lee.
Yes using PHP. Could we simply just call session_write_close() immediately
after we open and verify the session details? I'd like to avoid adding
another piece of infrastructure (redis) on every web server.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249233,249352#msg-249352
OK, Thanks for your comment. We will fix that and welcome any
suggestion. Nginx is almost a forward proxy, it's useful for some
proxy users.
Thank you.
2014-04-16 22:31 GMT+08:00 Maxim Dounin :
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 09:44:04PM +0800, Weibin Yao wrote:
>
>> Tengine are ready to add
Thanks for quick confirmation
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249346,249349#msg-249349
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Thanks a lot for quick confirmation
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249347,249348#msg-249348
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 10:30:24 Shrirang wrote:
> I am using "ngx_http_limit_req" module. After going through the code I see
> that if "burst = 0" (i.e. not specified) then maximum rate limiting that can
> be offered is 1000 RPS only. I have seen this in my stress test too.
> I didn't see this
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:30:24AM -0400, Shrirang wrote:
> I am using "ngx_http_limit_req" module. After going through the code I see
> that if "burst = 0" (i.e. not specified) then maximum rate limiting that can
> be offered is 1000 RPS only. I have seen this in my stress test too.
> I d
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 09:44:04PM +0800, Weibin Yao wrote:
> Tengine are ready to add the support of forward proxy, you can have a
> look at this pull request: https://github.com/alibaba/tengine/pull/335
Just a note: support for CONNECT method != forward proxy. It
doesn't make other pa
I am using "ngx_http_limit_req" module. After going through the code I see
that if "burst = 0" (i.e. not specified) then maximum rate limiting that can
be offered is 1000 RPS only. I have seen this in my stress test too.
I didn't see this in any documentation. Want to clarify if this is really
true
Hi,
I have setup nginx with ngx_cache_purge to work with mediawiki
nginx.conf
###
fastcgi_cache_path /etc/nginx/cache levels=1:2 keys_zone=MYAPP:100m
inactive=60m;
fastcgi_cache_key "$scheme$host$request_uri";
###
vhost.conf
###
set $no_cache "";
if ($request_method !~ ^(GET|HEAD
Tengine are ready to add the support of forward proxy, you can have a
look at this pull request: https://github.com/alibaba/tengine/pull/335
Thanks.
2014-04-16 17:41 GMT+08:00 Maxim Dounin :
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:51:04AM -0400, sai1511 wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to setup Forward SSL
I found where the problems was. I thought ssl options can be different in
virtual host. Default server settings was not overwritten.
server {
include conf/default-settings;
root /var/www;
server_name "";
ssl on;
ssl_certificate ssl/nmz_ssl.crt;
ssl
Check that you have run the same nginx, that you are trying to configure.
$ ps -fC nginx
wbr, Valentin V. Bartenev
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
I recompiled with default openssl lib (1.0.1e-3ubuntu1.2)
Default install path:
# nginx -V
nginx version: nginx/1.5.13
built by gcc 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu9)
TLS SNI support enabled
configure arguments: --prefix=/usr/local/nginx/1.5.13
--conf-path=/etc/nginx/nginx.conf --error-log-pa
I think the problem is your nginx uses libssl version from your OS
(0.9.8/1.0.0).
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:08 PM, B.R. wrote:
> Rather than posting raw outputs, try to understand the piece orf advice
> Maxim gave to you.
>
> I suspect those SSL-validation websites test websites... which corres
Rather than posting raw outputs, try to understand the piece orf advice
Maxim gave to you.
I suspect those SSL-validation websites test websites... which correspond
to a certain standard port.
I see a problem, don't you ?
---
*B. R.*
___
nginx mailing li
agree
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,240278,249336#msg-249336
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 06:23:13 nanne wrote:
> Thanks for the update on this! I'll check it out, though I believe we will
> have to keep the current 1.4.7 stable for now.
>
> Sadly I am not able to provide a debug log on the production machine. I can
> provide one from a test-environment of co
Thank you, that makes sense and a bit of testing reveals that is correct.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:38:10PM +1000, SplitIce wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have spent the day troubleshooting why one server in our network
> reload
Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> It looks like you are testing something different, not nginx you
> are trying to configure. Check what is actually listening on the
> ip:port you are testing.
testssl.sh:
--> Testing HTTP Header response
HSTS
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 08:38:10PM +1000, SplitIce wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have spent the day troubleshooting why one server in our network reloaded
> / tested configuration extremely slowly.
>
> We have found that server_names scales very poorly, once a certain point is
> reached (approx
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 06:35:43AM -0400, Nemesiz wrote:
> Strange things are happening.
>
> nginx:
> ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2;
>
> Results:
>
> ssllabs.com:
> TLS 1.2 No
> TLS 1.1 No
> TLS 1.0 Yes
> SSL 3 Yes
> SSL 2 No
>
> testssl.sh
Hi all,
I have spent the day troubleshooting why one server in our network reloaded
/ tested configuration extremely slowly.
We have found that server_names scales very poorly, once a certain point is
reached (approx 5.5k entries globally, 5k entries for a single host)
performance drops from a <0
Strange things are happening.
nginx:
ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2;
Results:
ssllabs.com:
TLS 1.2 No
TLS 1.1 No
TLS 1.0 Yes
SSL 3 Yes
SSL 2 No
testssl.sh:
SSLv2 NOT offered (ok)
SSLv3 offered
TLSv1 offered (ok)
TLSv1.1 not offered
TLSv1.2
Thanks for the update on this! I'll check it out, though I believe we will
have to keep the current 1.4.7 stable for now.
Sadly I am not able to provide a debug log on the production machine. I can
provide one from a test-environment of course, but it seems beyond me to
recreate the issues there :
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:51:04AM -0400, sai1511 wrote:
> I'm trying to setup Forward SSL Proxy through nginx. However I came across
> this post,http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,15124,15256#msg-15256. Is this
> still not supported or you just don't have this on your list ?
No changes si
Hi
On 16 April 2014 09:58, justink101 wrote:
> Maxim.
>
> Even after disabling SPDY and restarting nginx, still seeing the same
> behavior with requests blocking if another single request is outstanding in
> another tab.
Are you using php by any chance? I had a problem showing these exact sa
Maxim.
Even after disabling SPDY and restarting nginx, still seeing the same
behavior with requests blocking if another single request is outstanding in
another tab.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249233,249324#msg-249324
___
Hi,
I'm trying to setup Forward SSL Proxy through nginx. However I came across
this post,http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,15124,15256#msg-15256. Is this
still not supported or you just don't have this on your list ?
Thank You
Sai
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249323,
30 matches
Mail list logo
