Any expert opinions???
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249161,249185#msg-249185
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
how to write a filter module after the postpone filter .
if i change module's config file or complie file (auto/) ? any example?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245707,249183#msg-249183
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
Hi. If nginx ties back to a mysql backend on a remote server for
IMAP/SMTP, don't I need to add
$protocol_ports->{'smtp'}=25;
below the $protocol_ports->{'imap'}=143;
?
Also I should not be listening to 993 on my actual backend but rather
143 and just enforce TLS and make sure the ssl protocols a
> Also it's worth to look at the recent nginx blog post regarding
> heartbleed:
>
> http://nginx.com/blog/nginx-and-the-heartbleed-vulnerability/
>
thanx for the link maxim, has been incorporated
regards,
mex
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249102,249178#msg-249
Thanks a ton, that worked. I read a few bug reports but didn't see that one.
I'm not sure how our config worked previously since we've been using SPDY and
proxy_cache for a month :\.
Sincerely,
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: nginx-boun...@nginx.org [mailto:nginx-boun...@nginx.org] On
Hello!
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:51:24AM -0400, Jeff Kaufman wrote:
> In ngx_pagespeed we interpret --with-debug to mean "include debugging
> symbols and debug-only assertions". Is this what most people using
> nginx would expect?
>
> (We distribute two precompiled versions of PSOL, "debug" an
In ngx_pagespeed we interpret --with-debug to mean "include debugging
symbols and debug-only assertions". Is this what most people using
nginx would expect?
(We distribute two precompiled versions of PSOL, "debug" and
"release", and we've been using --with-debug to switch between them.
Now we're
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 08:22:10 nginxsantos wrote:
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> I know it is simple. But, will we not get more performance benefit if we
> create the pools before hand. Say I will create a memory pool for the
> connections (for example say with 4000 entries). Everytime I need
Suppose, I am allocating a pool of greater than 4k(page size). Say for
example I am calling the function ngx_create_pool with 8096.
But, this function will set the max as 4095 even if it has allocated 8K. Not
sure, why is it being done like this.
p->max = (size < NGX_MAX_ALLOC_FROM_POOL) ? siz
Hello Nginx users,
Now available: Nginx 1.5.3 for Windows http://goo.gl/D75u6G (32-bit and
64-bit versions)
These versions are to support legacy users who are already using Cygwin
based builds of Nginx. Officially supported native Windows binaries are at
nginx.org.
Announcements are also availab
Thank you for the reply.
I know it is simple. But, will we not get more performance benefit if we
create the pools before hand. Say I will create a memory pool for the
connections (for example say with 4000 entries). Everytime I need one, I
will go and get it from that pool and when I free it, I w
Hello!
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:41:17PM -0400, abstein2 wrote:
> Maxim,
>
> Thanks so much for clarifying. Just to make sure I'm understanding
> correctly, if I had something like this pseudo-code
>
> upstream upstream1 { }
> upstream upstream2 { }
> upstream upstream3 { }
> upstream upstream
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 04:55:42 nginxsantos wrote:
> Nginx when it accepts a connection, it creates a memory pool for that
> connection (allocating from heap). After which further memory requirement
> for that connection will be allocated from that pool. This is good.
> But, why don't we pre c
Also I noticed that initially for a connection, it allocates a pool of size
256 and if that exceeds, it goes and calls ngx_palloc_large which in turn
calls malloc.
So, can we not allocate more in the first attempt.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249144,249149#msg-249149
On 4/9/14 2:18 AM, mex wrote:
> Guide to Nginx + SSL + SPDY has been updated with some infos, links and
> tests
> regarding heartbleed
>
> https://www.mare-system.de/guide-to-nginx-ssl-spdy-hsts/#heartbleed
>
Also it's worth to look at the recent nginx blog post regarding
heartbleed:
http://ngi
This module is just to monitor the status page. Is there any SNMP module
which can generate some snmp alarms when certain threshold exceeds or when
there is a crash?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,248344,249146#msg-249146
___
My bad, in one location I forgot to remove port, that is why nginx tried to
resolve upstream as hostname.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,249142,249145#msg-249145
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/
Nginx when it accepts a connection, it creates a memory pool for that
connection (allocating from heap). After which further memory requirement
for that connection will be allocated from that pool. This is good.
But, why don't we pre create the memory pools depending upon the number of
connections
Hello!
You need to use resolver directive in Nginx.
Also you need to set DNS entries for your backend hostname.
Best regards,
Makailol
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:49 PM, kay wrote:
> I'm trying to set upstream names by variables, but nginx recognizes
> variables as hostnames, not upstream names.
I'm trying to set upstream names by variables, but nginx recognizes
variables as hostnames, not upstream names.
For example:
map $cookie_backend $proxy_host {
default 'backend1';
'1' 'backend2';
}
... ... ...
upstream backend1 {
server backend123:8080;
server backen
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 06:20:42 Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
> We're using nginx 1.5.12 and 1.5.13 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS via Azure VM.
>
> Since last night, on both FireFox and Chrome, Windows and OSX, we're having
> difficulty with SPDY. If the browser cache is warm and proxy_cache is
> enabled
21 matches
Mail list logo
