I could finally get hold of all the http header fields. A nice link that
describes how to access the headers
http://wiki.nginx.org/HeadersManagement
Thanks for all the replies.
Mapper Uno wrote in post #1141373:
> Thanks Maxim for your reply. Since I am newbie, please excuse my
> questions. I
On 3/28/2014 1:58 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> Nobody care enough to submit a patch.
> Likely due to the fact that SNI isn't considered to be an option
> for serious SSL-enabled sites anyway due to still limited
> client-side support, see here for details:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Na
Hi
I am struggling with the very same issue at the moment...
If I read the right the code correctly all that nginx cares about is cache
size, keys zone size is not checked at all (except when more space needs to
be allocated).
ngx_http_file_cache_manager(void *data)
{
//
if (size < cach
Trying now, will let you know how it goes. Thanks!
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,242426,248876#msg-248876
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hello!
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:20:30PM +0200, Mapper Uno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote an nginx module that handles POST data and returns back the same
> (something similar to echo_read_request_body in echo module) however,
> in echo module the input buffer is passed as is to output buffer.
> How
Hello!
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:53:33AM +0200, Mapper Uno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing an nginx module that processes POST requests. For small
> data typically less than 1000 bytes, the module successfully receives
> data. However, for larger data > 1000 bytes or so, I get NULL.
>
> ngx_
Hi,
Thank you very much for the fast response. It turns out that I have somehow
missed the response. Variable ssl_protocol is what I need.
Regards,
Kiril
On Mar 17, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Embedded Variables
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
Hello!
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:38:53PM +0400, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:
> On Thursday 27 March 2014 20:23:15 Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 01:34:19PM +0400, kyprizel wrote:
> >
> > > will be "log_alloc_failures" better?
> >
> > I think something like "log_