If I pass a variable, set to true via a fastcgi_param, does it arrive as
a logical or string value?
If it's a string, is there a way to pass as a logical true/false?
Cheers,
Steve
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailm
Hello all,
I'd like to know if nginx supports / plans to support triggering SNMP alarms in
the near future?
Thanks,
Niru
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Sarah (and Aaron),
Thank you the clarification. At this point we'll have to revisit our options
for session persistance and load balancing. If we have any questions about
nginx I'll reach out to you.
thanks!
John
-Original Message-
From: nginx-boun...@nginx.org [mailto:nginx-boun...@n
Maybe this will help
http://www.howtoforge.com/using-ngx_pagespeed-with-nginx-on-debian-wheezy
and
http://www.howtoforge.com/using-ngx_pagespeed-with-nginx-on-debian-jessie-testing
- right up your alley for Debian distro :)
I personally use CentOS build via Centmin Mod Nginx as it already includes
Hi John,
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:34 PM, John Reeve wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We are currently using the stable release of nginx. We'd really like to
> implement the sticky directive that was added to the HTTP Upstream Module in
> the mainline release in 1.5.7
> (http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ng
For testing the new binary and being able to revert quickly to the other
one, use the advice on this documentation page:
http://nginx.org/en/docs/control.html
That way, you will have virtually no downtime and only stop the old nginx
process when you decide the new one is doing its job.
---
*B. R.*
Thank you for your suggestion. I understand about the DoS issue.
proxy_cache_bypass indeed is the solution. Documentation was not clear about
it, but the result is written to cache. The cache is only bypassed in the
lookup fase, not in the write back fase.
I worked out this bit of configuration. T
Hi!
We are currently using the stable release of nginx. We'd really like to
implement the sticky directive that was added to the HTTP Upstream Module in
the mainline release in 1.5.7
(http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_upstream_module.html#sticky)
My question is this... how long does it ta
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 15:34 -0400, Jeff Kaufman wrote:
> I haven't been able to find a good guide for people who have been
> using nginx as installed by their linux distribution who want to
> switch to using an nginx they built themselves. This comes up a lot
> with ngx_pagespeed because for many
On Thursday 13 Mar 2014 10:05:22 Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> 2014/03/13 16:11:01 [emerg] 14625#0: bind() to 0.0.0.0:80 failed
> (98: Address already in use)
> 2014/03/13 16:11:01 [emerg] 14625#0: bind() to [::]:80 failed (98:
> Address already in use)
> 2014/03/13 16:11:01 [emerg] 14625#0: bind() to 0.0.
I haven't been able to find a good guide for people who have been
using nginx as installed by their linux distribution who want to
switch to using an nginx they built themselves. This comes up a lot
with ngx_pagespeed because for many users we're the first module they
want which isn't packaged wit
Sorry for wasting your time you are correct secp512r1 isnt there when I run
the command.
Im guessing that secp256r1 isnt in the list because its just the default
one. Just using the default settings and not setting a curve uses secp256r1
and secp384r1 works by setting it in ssl_ecdh_curve.
I like
Awesome -- thanks so much for the quick reply!
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,248331,248333#msg-248333
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 13 Mar 2014, at 21:59, abstein2 wrote:
> Is there any negative performance impact with chaining include commands on
> nginx?
>
> For example, are any of these worse than any of the others from a
> performance perspective:
>
> In nginx.conf:
> include domain_config_1.conf;
> include domain_co
Is there any negative performance impact with chaining include commands on
nginx?
For example, are any of these worse than any of the others from a
performance perspective:
In nginx.conf:
include domain_config_1.conf;
include domain_config_2.conf;
OR
In nginx.conf:
include domain_configs.conf;
After upgrading my stack Apache2-Nginx Ubuntu stack to Ubuntu 14.04
beta, I am getting these errors in /var/log/nginx/error.log
2014/03/13 16:11:01 [emerg] 14625#0: bind() to 0.0.0.0:80 failed (98:
Address already in use)
2014/03/13 16:11:01 [emerg] 14625#0: bind() to [::]:80 failed (98:
Address a
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:20:41PM -0400, bcx wrote:
> I noticed that the nginx http proxy module by default does nothing with the
> Cache-Control request header that is sent by browsers.
>
> Most browsers (I tested Crome and Firefox, but from my online research it
> showed that even Inte
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:43:37AM -0400, nginxu14 wrote:
> Hi, It seems that secp521r1 has been removed from 1.4.6. Trying to use it in
> ssl_ecdh_curve doesnt work but worked in 1.4.5.
>
> Was this just a mistake or is there a reason why it has been removed?
It wasn't - nginx just uses
Hello!
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:31:42PM -0700, Jayadev C wrote:
>
>
> First time here, was looking at supporting http protocol (using
> nginx) over our custom zeromq server talking protocol buf. Read
> the excelled tutorial by Evan and was also looking at few
> similar plugins to get an id
I noticed that the nginx http proxy module by default does nothing with the
Cache-Control request header that is sent by browsers.
Most browsers (I tested Crome and Firefox, but from my online research it
showed that even Internet Explorer has the same behaviour) send a
Cache-Control: no-cache hea
Hi, It seems that secp521r1 has been removed from 1.4.6. Trying to use it in
ssl_ecdh_curve doesnt work but worked in 1.4.5.
Was this just a mistake or is there a reason why it has been removed?
Thanks.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,248325,248325#msg-248325
_
Hello,
As agentzh mentioned eval was causing the problem. I replaced eval with lua
and after changing the configuration accordingly I haven't seen any
segfaults again.
Thanks everybody for the help
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,247886,248324#msg-248324
__
Good morning all,
it was long time i was around with some solution to help me supporting
something right now is really complex, but i need to do.
Nginx looks like me last solution, so i've started with preliminary test,
now , and i'm asking you a little help to validate first if it is possible
and
23 matches
Mail list logo
