Makes sense
Thanks
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245544,245752#msg-245752
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 12/20/2013 3:20 PM, justin wrote:
Using:
resolver 127.0.0.1 valid=300s;
Does not work. I assume this would simply uses the DNS servers listed in
/etc/resolv.conf? Thanks.
The resolver directive tells NSD to do its own DNS lookups, bypassing
the system name lookup call (and thus /etc/resol
On 20 December 2013 23:20, justin wrote:
> Using:
>
> resolver 127.0.0.1 valid=300s;
>
> Does not work. I assume this would simply uses the DNS servers listed in
> /etc/resolv.conf?
Your assumption is wrong. You'd need to be running a local DNS
resolver for that config to work.
_
Using:
resolver 127.0.0.1 valid=300s;
Does not work. I assume this would simply uses the DNS servers listed in
/etc/resolv.conf? Thanks.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245748,245748#msg-245748
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@ng
On 2013-12-20 21:19, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On 12/19/13 1:59 PM, athalas wrote:
>> Where would we find documentation on the "fastopen" parameter?
>>
> http://nginx.org/r/listen
In the documentation above it's pointed out that the server needs to
tolerate the possibility of receiving duplicate in
On 12/19/13 1:59 PM, athalas wrote:
> Where would we find documentation on the "fastopen" parameter?
>
http://nginx.org/r/listen
--
Maxim Konovalov
http://nginx.com
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
> > Alternatively, what are your thoughts on making this adjustment
> > dynamically? Start the connection with small record size, then bump it to
> > higher limit? In theory, that would also avoid the extra config flag.
>
> In theory, this may
Oh great, so i can parameter using a cache mechanism using
fastcgi_cache_path or the Lua Module SRCACHE for my PHP upstream block
simply by checking for example $connections_waiting on each request.
I don't know exactly what would be a right setting for using a cache by
testing $connections_waiting
Hello!
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 09:54:21AM -0500, gglamenace wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to get the number of active connections in order to activate
> or a not a cache mechanism when nginx is in a high trafic period?
The following variable are available in the
ngx_http_stub_status_modul
Hello,
Is there a way to get the number of active connections in order to activate
or a not a cache mechanism when nginx is in a high trafic period?
Regards
Jerome
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245738,245738#msg-245738
___
On Friday 20 December 2013 14:36:43 Christos Trochalakis wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:43:37PM -0800, Andrew Alexeev wrote:
> >On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:41 PM, "justin" wrote:
> >> Any update or eta on when we can expect spdy protocol version 3 in the
> >> 1.5.X branch?
> >
> >Pretty soon, stay
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:43:37PM -0800, Andrew Alexeev wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:41 PM, "justin" wrote:
Any update or eta on when we can expect spdy protocol version 3 in the 1.5.X
branch?
Pretty soon, stay tuned and thanks for the patience!
Please also consider backporting spdy/3 (o
12 matches
Mail list logo
