Re: spdy protocol version 3 support

2013-12-19 Thread Andrew Alexeev
On Dec 19, 2013, at 6:41 PM, "justin" wrote: > Any update or eta on when we can expect spdy protocol version 3 in the 1.5.X > branch? Pretty soon, stay tuned and thanks for the patience! > Thanks. > > Posted at Nginx Forum: > http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245732,245732#msg-245732 > > ___

spdy protocol version 3 support

2013-12-19 Thread justin
Any update or eta on when we can expect spdy protocol version 3 in the 1.5.X branch? Thanks. Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245732,245732#msg-245732 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/list

Re: Optimizing NGINX TLS Time To First Byte (TTTFB)

2013-12-19 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:55:05PM -0800, Ilya Grigorik wrote: > > As of now, I tend to think that 4k (or 8k on systems with IW10) > > buffer size is optimal for latency-sensitive workloads. > > > > If we assume that new systems are using IW10 (which I think is reasonable), > then an 8K d

Re: Optimizing NGINX TLS Time To First Byte (TTTFB)

2013-12-19 Thread Ilya Grigorik
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > On 12/19/13 04:50, Alex wrote: > >> I remember reading (I believe it was in your (excellent) book! ;)) that >> upon packet loss, the full TLS record has to be retransmitted. Not cool >> if the TLS record is large and fragmented. So that's

Re: Proxy buffering

2013-12-19 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 07:21:13PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Hello! > Hi, > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:45:37PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:34:37AM -0500, Downchuck wrote: > > > Is there a large technical barrier to implementing this feature? Patches > > > h

Re: Parallel subrequests

2013-12-19 Thread honwel
Ok,thanks a lot,I will try. Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245707,245726#msg-245726 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

2013-12-19 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:48:45AM -0500, Larry wrote: > Ok, > > Now I get it right :) > > @Maxim : when you say faster memory storage, doesn't nginx get the result > cached by the os itself ? And so in the ram ? > > What could be faster than that ? Consider you have 100T of data on ro

Re: Parallel subrequests

2013-12-19 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:59:03AM -0500, honwel wrote: > Hi > >I want write a http hadler(using subrequest) to deal with combine > response from mutiple backend. but "Emiller's Advanced Topics In Nginx > Module Development - 2.3. Sequential subrequests" issue that " Subrequests > mi

Re: Force linking to static archives during make?

2013-12-19 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:03:31PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Thanks > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:16:55PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> This should be my last build question. > >> > >> $ ./auto/configure --with-http_ssl

Re: Proxy_cache or direct static files ?

2013-12-19 Thread Larry
Ok, Now I get it right :) @Maxim : when you say faster memory storage, doesn't nginx get the result cached by the os itself ? And so in the ram ? What could be faster than that ? Thanks Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245544,245721#msg-245721

Re: nginx misbehaviour in conjunction with non-ASCII characters

2013-12-19 Thread ako673de
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 06:27:31PM -0500, ako673de wrote: > > Found a bug in implementation of MOVE and COPY (webdav) methods. It happens if destination header contains non-ASCII characters (that need to be escaped with "%"). > I have a patch for that, would you like to try it? Well, currentl

Re: Optimizing NGINX TLS Time To First Byte (TTTFB)

2013-12-19 Thread Maxim Dounin
Hello! On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:04:59PM -0800, Ilya Grigorik wrote: > > On the other hand, it looks good enough to have records up to > > initial CWND in size without any significant latency changes. And > > with IW10 this basically means that anything up to about 14k > > should be fine (with

Re: nginx-1.5.8

2013-12-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:59:34AM -0500, athalas wrote: > Where would we find documentation on the "fastopen" parameter? It's in the works. ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: Optimizing NGINX TLS Time To First Byte (TTTFB)

2013-12-19 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On 12/19/13 04:50, Alex wrote: I remember reading (I believe it was in your (excellent) book! ;)) that upon packet loss, the full TLS record has to be retransmitted. Not cool if the TLS record is large and fragmented. So that's indeed a good reason to keep TLS records small and preferably within

Re: nginx-1.5.8

2013-12-19 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On 12/19/13 13:59, athalas wrote: Where would we find documentation on the "fastopen" parameter? "fastopen" parameter set TCP_FASTOPEN socket option on Linux: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_Fast_Open ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://m

Re: nginx-1.5.8

2013-12-19 Thread athalas
Where would we find documentation on the "fastopen" parameter? Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,245651,245713#msg-245713 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: nginx misbehaviour in conjunction with non-ASCII characters

2013-12-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 06:27:31PM -0500, ako673de wrote: > Found a bug in implementation of MOVE and COPY (webdav) methods. It happens > if destination header contains non-ASCII characters (that need to be escaped > with "%"). > > An example: > > Rename (=MOVE) file "/TheCore.ogm" to "/The_Core.