Our own investigation indicates that, no, there is not way to directly
access the values in the limit_conn zones from "user space."
We created a new status page that reports all the existing zones and the
current connection counts for each, as well as what the current limits are.
It does this by w
OK, the problem is that you're listening on *http* on port 443. You need
to use
listen 443 ssl [default];
for ssl.
As an aside, you can combine the http: and https: configs, using the two
listen statements, and dropping the 'ssl on' in a single block. Makes
admin simpler... havn't chec
Problem i have is that after attempting to login to wordpress over SSL php is
not being processed/executed.
I've got a Wordpress 3.5 multi-site using subdirectories.
nginx version: nginx/1.4.2
built by gcc 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC)
TLS SNI support enabled
configure arguments: --pr
People,
I am trying out nginx-1.4.2-1.fc19.x86_64 and have installed:
mod_passenger-3.0.21-4.fc19.x86_64
rubygem-passenger-3.0.21-4.fc19.x86_64
rubygem-passenger-native-3.0.21-4.fc19.x86_64
rubygem-passenger-native-libs-3.0.21-4.fc19.x86_64
rubygem-passenger-devel-3.0.21-4.fc19.x86_64
In case it helps, here at my sysctl and applicable nginx config values
Sysctl
net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 0
net.ipv4.tcp_synack_retries = 2
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 1024 65535
net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 3
net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 1677721
Sorry, I meant $request_time.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243170,243171#msg-243171
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
We have a setup that looks like this:
nginx->haproxy->app servers
We are terminating SSL with nginx and it sits in front of everything. During
our peak load times, we are experiencing about a 2x performance hit.
Requests that would normally take 400 ms are taking 800ms. It's taking
longer for the
Hello Davromaniak
Thanks for pointing me to this patch. I have made the needed changes and
was able to compile it just fine.
Iry
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243166,243169#msg-243169
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
On 09/26/2013 04:27 PM, iwitham wrote:
> I am attempting to configure ngixn-1.4.1 on a SLES box for a galaxy server
> deployment. I am able to get it to work fine as long as I do not try to
> --add-module=../nginx_upload_module-2.2.0. When I add the upload_module to
> the configuration it fails a
I am attempting to configure ngixn-1.4.1 on a SLES box for a galaxy server
deployment. I am able to get it to work fine as long as I do not try to
--add-module=../nginx_upload_module-2.2.0. When I add the upload_module to
the configuration it fails as shown below:
../nginx_upload
Hello!
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:41:44PM -0400, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> One more question regarding this:
>
> > The
> >proxy_no_cache $request_body_file;
> > should do the trick, see http://nginx.org/r/proxy_no_cache.
>
> I tried this and get a warning:
>nginx: [warn] "proxy_no_cache" fun
Hello,
i have 2 upstreams, each with 3 backend servers, where backendA is the same
backend in both upstreams.
upstream one {
server backendA;
server backendB;
server backendC;
}
upstream two {
server backendA;
server backendD;
server backendE;
}
A user with his IP sends
Hi,
what you are looking for is the "include" - statement, see here:
http://nginx.org/en/docs/ngx_core_module.html#include
regards,
mex
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,243159,243161#msg-243161
___
nginx mailing list
ng
On 26/09/13 19:20, Maurizio De Santis wrote:
I have two locations, /a and /b . Both of them share these directives
expires max;
add_header Cache-Control public;
add_header ETag "";
break;
and location /b to has gzip_static on too.
Is there a way to write this without writing tw
I have two locations, /a and /b . Both of them share these directives
expires max;
add_header Cache-Control public;
add_header ETag "";
break;
and location /b to has gzip_static on too.
Is there a way to write this without writing two times the common
directives?
That is, with
15 matches
Mail list logo