Maxim,
Does it seem reasonable that the 499 status codes are responsible for double
requests? I.E. do you think the client is resending the request after the
499 status?
Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> Hello!
>
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 09:09:55PM -0
Thanks! that worked :)
I didn't think about parent directories
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 23:17 -0400, Travis Maxwell wrote:
>> Whenever I submit a long post from within wordpress, I get the
>> following error:
>>
>> 2013/06/04 03:04:19 [crit] 1
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 23:17 -0400, Travis Maxwell wrote:
> Whenever I submit a long post from within wordpress, I get the
> following error:
>
> 2013/06/04 03:04:19 [crit] 12248#0: *491 open()
> "/var/lib/nginx/tmp/client_body/08" failed (13: Permission denied)
> It works fine if the post
Whenever I submit a long post from within wordpress, I get the following error:
2013/06/04 03:04:19 [crit] 12248#0: *491 open()
"/var/lib/nginx/tmp/client_body/08" failed (13: Permission denied)
It works fine if the post isn't that long, but submitting a long one throws a
500 error on th
Thanks for your fast reply, Antonio!
I forgot to say, that I try to only enable SSL on ACP on not for the rest of
the forum :)
Von: nginx-boun...@nginx.org [mailto:nginx-boun...@nginx.org] Im Auftrag von
António P. P. Almeida
Gesendet: Dienstag, 04. Juni 2013 02:02
An: nginx
Betreff: Re: WBB ACP H
Try:
server {
server_name forum;
...
location ^~ /acp/ {
return 301 https://forum$request_uri;
}
}
server {
server_name forum;
listen 443 ssl;
location / {
return 301 http://forum$request_uri;
}
location ^~ /acp/ {
Hello,
I'm trying since about half an hour to get SSL-only on the administration
panel of Woltlab burning board working, but without success. The rule will
just be ignored.
What I currently have:
location /acp/(.*)$ {
if ($server_port = 80) {
rewrite ^/(.*)$ https://forum/acp/$1
Hi,
nginx does its job correctly:
$ curl -I http://nginx.org/404
$ HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
$ [...]
I guess the irregular response comes from your mod_perl backend? Did you
check that out?
Capturing nginx's debug output of such a request will probably help.
http://nginx.org/en/docs/deb
We're using nginx as a middle layer in front of our application server
(mod_perl). When mod_perl returns an error page, the HTTP status line is
missing the "reason phrase" after the status code, like "Not Found", e.g.
HTTP/1.1 404
Server: nginx/1.2.1
...etc
should be
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
...e
I got nginx websocket proxy working but the socket would close
in a minute or so. So I add
proxy_read_timeout 180s;
and it works within 3 minutes but closed the websocket after 3
minutes, but it works OK before that. Why is that?
BTW, I am using Nginx 1.4 now.
Thanks,
- Alder
___
On Jun 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Belly wrote:
>>> What is the best setting for my situation?
>>
>> I would recommend using "fastcgi_max_temp_file_size 0;" if you
>> want to disable disk buffering (see [1]), and configuring some
>> reasonable number of reasonably sized fastcgi_buffers. I would
>>
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:13:03AM -0400, Belly wrote:
> Thanks Maxim for you answer!
>
> Maxim Dounin Wrote:
> ---
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:57:21AM -0400, Belly wrote:
> >
> > > Hello nginx!
> > >
> > > I have on
Thanks Maxim for you answer!
Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:57:21AM -0400, Belly wrote:
>
> > Hello nginx!
> >
> > I have one worker-process, which uses over 25GB memory (and doesn't
> stop to
> > do that).
> >
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:57:21AM -0400, Belly wrote:
> Hello nginx!
>
> I have one worker-process, which uses over 25GB memory (and doesn't stop to
> do that).
> My configuration is... let's say special:
>
> So there is nginx, which proxies all requests to the PHP backend and the PHP
>
Thanks for your reply!
I don't have performance issues. It's just the memory usage.
I don't know how nginx handles its memory, but if I increase the number of
worker processes wouldn't this lead into much higher memory usage
(worker_process*25GB) ?
The one worker is able to handle all requests, I
Hello,
Please assign worker-processors according to the number of cpus your
server have and reduce or comment the values regarding fastcgi buffers and
examine the changes after doing it.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Belly wrote:
> Hello nginx!
>
> I have one worker-process, which use
Hello nginx!
I have one worker-process, which uses over 25GB memory (and doesn't stop to
do that).
My configuration is... let's say special:
So there is nginx, which proxies all requests to the PHP backend and the PHP
backend sends a large request back to nginx. I set the fastcgi_buffers very
eno
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:06:46PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:31:58AM +0200, Rasmus Glud Andersen wrote:
>
> > After running nginx 1.2.1 with the following configuration, I now get
> > warnings when testing the same configuration under 1.4.1
> >
> > [error]
> > $
hi all
i want to ask about importing our existing static files into nginx + mogilefs
module
is that posibble to add like proxy_store and proxy_pass from http address?___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:31:58AM +0200, Rasmus Glud Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After running nginx 1.2.1 with the following configuration, I now get
> warnings when testing the same configuration under 1.4.1
>
> Any advice on this would be highly appreciated.
>
>
> [error]
> $ nginx
Hi,
After running nginx 1.2.1 with the following configuration, I now get warnings
when testing the same configuration under 1.4.1
Any advice on this would be highly appreciated.
[error]
$ nginx -t -c /tmp/nginx.conf
21 matches
Mail list logo
