Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> Hello!
** snip**
> (On the other hand, it may iterfere with normal cache operations
> and may cause problems you observe, much like any other 3rd party
> module. That's why we usually ask people to reproduce the issu
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:37:59AM -0700, John Watson wrote:
> I noticed there was a patch submitted couple years ago that was never
> accepted and last year a post saying to expect it around Jan 2013. I
> understand SPDY probably pushed the roadmap back a bit. So I was wondering
> if ther
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:16:34PM -0400, gwinans wrote:
> Maxim Dounin Wrote:
> ---
> > Hello!
> >
>
> ** snip**
>
> > Have you tried without the cache purge module compiled in?
> >
> > --
> > Maxim Dounin
>
> I have not -- this is
I noticed there was a patch submitted couple years ago that was never
accepted and last year a post saying to expect it around Jan 2013. I
understand SPDY probably pushed the roadmap back a bit. So I was wondering
if there is a new estimate for when to expect this 1.3.x roadmap item to be
completed
Maxim Dounin Wrote:
---
> Hello!
>
** snip**
> Have you tried without the cache purge module compiled in?
>
> --
> Maxim Dounin
I have not -- this is actually an RPM-build from the Atomic Repo. Wouldn't
removing said purge module disable the
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:28:46PM -0400, gwinans wrote:
> The cache manager process is, indeed, running. I even did a brief strace on
> it to be sure it was actually working. There is nothing in the logs that
> indicates an issue. In fact, the only thing in the logs is expected http
> req
The cache manager process is, indeed, running. I even did a brief strace on
it to be sure it was actually working. There is nothing in the logs that
indicates an issue. In fact, the only thing in the logs is expected http
requests.
Output of nginx -V:
[root@nginx01-dpl ~]# nginx -V
nginx version:
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:46:55AM -0400, gwinans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We setup some nginx instances a few months ago in order to serve up/cache
> video content. Recently, we've noticed that there is *severe* cache overrun
> -- on the order of 1TB + per cache directory.
>
> It seems li
Hi folks,
We setup some nginx instances a few months ago in order to serve up/cache
video content. Recently, we've noticed that there is *severe* cache overrun
-- on the order of 1TB + per cache directory.
It seems like proxy_cache_path is entirely ignoring the max_size value
specified in the con
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#listen
On 8 April 2013 14:36, Kenneth Yeh wrote:
> Hi, I am new user of nginx, and wondering if nginx can linsten two diffent
> port within one nginx process?
>
> Thanks
>
> Posted at Nginx Forum:
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,238197,
Hi, I am new user of nginx, and wondering if nginx can linsten two diffent
port within one nginx process?
Thanks
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,238197,238197#msg-238197
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.n
Thanks Valentin. I have emailed you (off-list) some debug logs /
screenshots.
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,233497,238195#msg-238195
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
On 8 Apr2013, at 11:46 , Ian M. Evans wrote:
> I began thinking about using Puppet to automate deployment and that led me
> to thinking about using rpms to make keeping up with new releases easier.
>
> Since I've always compiled nginx from source, I was curious how one
> specifies configure ar
I began thinking about using Puppet to automate deployment and that led me
to thinking about using rpms to make keeping up with new releases easier.
Since I've always compiled nginx from source, I was curious how one
specifies configure arguments like --with-http_ssl_module and
--with-http_gzip_s
14 matches
Mail list logo
