centos5.5 + nginx-1.3.14
I use the limit_speed_zone
(https://github.com/yaoweibin/nginx_limit_speed_module),and set the
nginx.conf:
http {
limit_speed_zone one $server_port 10m;
server {
listen 8080;
server_name localhost;
location / {
root /op
Hello, I've found that when there are upstream servers unavailable in
my upstream group, applying a little bit of load on the server (i.e.,
just myself browsing around quickly, 2-3 req/s max) results in the
following errors even for upstream servers that are available and
well:
2013/04/04 22:02:21
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:20:42PM +0200, Davide D'Amico wrote:
> Il 04/04/13 11:34, Francis Daly ha scritto:
> >On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:01:17AM +0200, Davide D'Amico wrote:
Hi there,
> >I suspect that the suggestions are increasingly more efficient -- but
> >you presumably have the interest t
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:21:57AM -0400, ankurs wrote:
[...]
> [root@localhost sbin]# ./nginx -V
> nginx version: nginx/1.2.7
> built by gcc 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC)
> configure arguments: --with-http_stub_status_module --with-http_perl_module
> --with-http_flv_module --ad
*** glibc detected *** nginx: worker process: double free or corruption
(!prev): 0x08281500 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x760e6)[0x7f10da7370e6]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x78c13)[0x7f10da739c13]
/lib64/libc.so.6(fclose+0x14d)[0x7f10da72774d]
nginx: worker process[0x46db59]
n
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:18:53AM +1300, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm sharing processing load across 3 remote servers, and am having a
> terrible time getting it balanced.
>
> Here's the config
>
> upstream backend {
> server 192.168.162.218:9000 fail_tim
This is what was done to solve the problem. I am providing the two relevant
location blocks.
# protect the "secure" folder ( /var/www/html/secure )
location /secure/ {
auth_basic "Restricted";
auth_basic_user_file /var/www/protected/.htpasswd;
}
# T
Ok, it's what I supposed but I was not sure.
Is there an alternative ?
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,238097,238104#msg-238104
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Thanks, ive already used this resources trying the below but it doesnt make
a difference, the rails static page is still being served. I think maybe i
need to disable that first, thanks for your help.
error_page 404 =301 http://example.com/notfound.html;
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://forum.ngin
On 4 April 2013 11:40, johnnybut7 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ive received a request stating that the website owner wants all 404 error
> messages redirected to the home page as its affecting their seo ranking(im
> not sure about this myself but thats another issue). Its a rails application
> so i have stati
Hi
That's a good idea but I think it's not possible
The key is set before request is sent to backend but it can only know
the content length after the request is sent to backend (catch 22)
On 04/04/13 12:59, ntib1 wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to put $content_length in proxy_cache_key in order nginx to
Hi,
I'd like to put $content_length in proxy_cache_key in order nginx to check
if file had changed and send it instead of old file if it's case.
But the $content_length is always empty. Why ?
Or do you have another solution for my problem ?
Thanks,
Thibaut
Posted at Nginx Forum:
http://foru
Hi,
Ive received a request stating that the website owner wants all 404 error
messages redirected to the home page as its affecting their seo ranking(im
not sure about this myself but thats another issue). Its a rails application
so i have static page displayed currently and even applied some java
Thanks for sharing, sounds really good.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 04. April 2013 um 10:17 Uhr
Von: "Roberto De Ioris"
An: nginx@nginx.org
Betreff: [semi-OT] GridFS uWSGI plugin
Hi everyone, latest uWSGI release got GridFS support:
https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/GridFS.html
In my c
Il 04/04/13 11:34, Francis Daly ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:01:17AM +0200, Davide D'Amico wrote:
Hi there,
Is it better to use (in terms of performances, reliability, load on the
reverse proxy) the rewrite rules on the nginx reverse proxy, or use the
rewrite rules on the apache22 ba
location / {
rewrite^/(.*)/(.*)$ /$1/index.php?url=$2;
}
I would suggest to use try_files:
location / {
try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php?url=$uri&$args;
}
Personally instead of pasing the uri in the 'url' param I like to use
try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php?$args; a
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:01:17AM +0200, Davide D'Amico wrote:
Hi there,
> Is it better to use (in terms of performances, reliability, load on the
> reverse proxy) the rewrite rules on the nginx reverse proxy, or use the
> rewrite rules on the apache22 backend?
Completely untested, but it see
Thank you!
Best regards,
Dmitriy Shalashov
2013/4/4 Igor Sysoev
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:46 , Дмитрий Шалашов wrote:
>
> Heeey :-)
>
> Is it safe to enable it?
>
>
> Yes, it is safe. Probably, it should be enabled by default.
>
>
> --
> Igor Sysoev
>
> 2013/3/29 Дмитрий Шалашов
>
>> Hi.
>>
>>
On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:46 , Дмитрий Шалашов wrote:
> Heeey :-)
>
> Is it safe to enable it?
Yes, it is safe. Probably, it should be enabled by default.
--
Igor Sysoev
> 2013/3/29 Дмитрий Шалашов
> Hi.
>
> Why is this parameter disabled by default?
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitriy Shalashov
Heeey :-)
Is it safe to enable it?
Best regards,
Dmitriy Shalashov
2013/3/29 Дмитрий Шалашов
> Hi.
>
> Why is this parameter disabled by default?
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitriy Shalashov
>
___
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.or
Hello
I have this issue trying to use post_action
My config is like this:
location / {
post_action /afterdownload;
...
...
...
location /afterdownload {
proxy_pass
http://78.140.165.80/download_counter.php?FileName=$request&status=$request_completion
;
internal
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 09:58:57PM -0400, tssungeng wrote:
Hi there,
> You know,the ngx_http_limit_zone_module can limit the speed of an IP .
Can it?
If you can show your configuration that does that, then it should be
straightforward to modify it to use the server port or server name
instead
> Weibin: Have you thought of upstreaming the no_buffer patch to nginx
1.3.x
> so it could become part of next nginx stable version 1.4 ?
> It'd be really nice to have the no_buffer functionality in stock nginx!
I agree. Nginx is such an excellent product - but this is a missing
feature.
Thanks
M
Hi everyone, latest uWSGI release got GridFS support:
https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/GridFS.html
In my company we are using it behind nginx for serving items from a
replica set
https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/GridFS.html#combining-with-nginx
Currently the plugin misse
Anton Yuzhaninov Wrote:
---
> > rewrite ^/favicon.ico /var/www/media/images/favicon.X.ico last;
>
> This is wrong - you can rewrite to other location, not to path on file
> system.
> Anyway rewrite does not need here, use location.
Sorry, my ba
Hi,
I've two freebsd 9.1 vm (2 corees, 4gb ram) with nginx-1.2.7 in
active/passive mode (using carp), acting as a reverse proxy to 4
apache22 backend (2 cores, 4gb ram).
I should set 800 simple rewrite rules, such as:
rewrite ^/something/foo.html /bar.html permanent;
I cannot use any regexp t
26 matches
Mail list logo
