Re: Mail proxy with SNI

On 2013-03-30 at 02:24 +0400, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote: > On Saturday 30 March 2013 01:30:21 lblankers wrote: > > I would like to use nginx 1.2.1 with TLS SNI support to proxy SMTP > > submission for several different domains over SSL. I would expect that if I > > configure multiple servers with

Re: Mail proxy with SNI

On Saturday 30 March 2013 01:30:21 lblankers wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use nginx 1.2.1 with TLS SNI support to proxy SMTP > submission for several different domains over SSL. I would expect that if I > configure multiple servers with different server names that a TLS v1 client > will select

Mail proxy with SNI

Hi, I would like to use nginx 1.2.1 with TLS SNI support to proxy SMTP submission for several different domains over SSL. I would expect that if I configure multiple servers with different server names that a TLS v1 client will select the correct one through SNI. However I always get the first cer

Re: Why use haproxy now ?

We never really use nginx in straight proxy mode - we always have some munging or something to do to the request or response along with cacheing, etc. So, we'd wind up using nginx (or varnish) along with haproxy anyway and that's just an unneeded layer for us, right now. Apache TrafficServer looks

Re: why socket for communication between master and worker used the so large memory?

Hello! On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 07:14:49PM +0800, MCoder wrote: > it's description in man lsof > > SIZE, SIZE/OFF, or OFFSET > ... In other cases, files don't have true sizes - e.g., sockets, > FIFOs, pipes - so lsof displays for their sizes the content amounts it > finds in their kernel

reset_timedout_connection

Hi. Why is this parameter disabled by default? Best regards, Dmitriy Shalashov ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx

Re: why socket for communication between master and worker used the so large memory?

it's description in man lsof SIZE, SIZE/OFF, or OFFSET ... In other cases, files don't have true sizes - e.g., sockets, FIFOs, pipes - so lsof displays for their sizes the content amounts it finds in their kernel buffer descriptors (e.g., socket buffer size counts or TCP/IP window sizes.)

Re: why socket for communication between master and worker used the so large memory?

Hello! On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 06:04:54PM +0800, MCoder wrote: > my nginx is just a http tunul proxy http connection, and max connection is > just lower than 100. > > # ps aux > root 19849 0.0 0.0 18028 2452 ?Ss2012 0:00 nginx: > master process /usr/local/qqwebsrv/nginx/sbi

why socket for communication between master and worker used the so large memory?

my nginx is just a http tunul proxy http connection, and max connection is just lower than 100. # ps aux root 19849 0.0 0.0 18028 2452 ?Ss2012 0:00 nginx: master process /usr/local/qqwebsrv/nginx/sbin/nginx nobody 25389 0.1 0.0 19752 4104 ?SMar25 9:07 ngin

Re: Why use haproxy now ?

Yes and no, persistent cache is marked as experimental. And actually we are testing Apache Traffic Server as cache server. As I said before nginx is great http server and good proxy but haproxy has more features. I hope that nginx will be as good as haproxy in proxy mode. But this time is slower a

Re: Why use haproxy now ?

On Mar 28, 2013, at 19:20 , Reinis Rozitis wrote: > Also the cache residing 1:1 on the filesystem makes it problematic in setups > where you have a lot of cachable objects. At least in my case the nginx cache > manager process took way too much resources/io when traversing the directory > tree

Re: Compiling Nginx on Windows 7

To fix the error open a MSYS Bash and run the following command: mv /usr/bin/link.exe /usr/bin/link_.exe Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,237923,237929#msg-237929 ___ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/m