* David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-04-02 02:02
> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:38:51 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > [PATCH] [TCP]: Fix invalid skb referencing in LOST marker code
> >
> > The after() referenced an invalid skb if loop exited when skb had
> > reached
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:38:51 +0300 (EEST)
> [PATCH] [TCP]: Fix invalid skb referencing in LOST marker code
>
> The after() referenced an invalid skb if loop exited when skb had
> reached sk_write_queue. I chose to move this part inside the loop
> where
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 3/31/2007, "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:10:54 +0200
> >
> > > * David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-30 14:43
> > > > Let's not speculate, let's find out for
On 3/31/2007, "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:10:54 +0200
>
> > * David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-30 14:43
> > > Let's not speculate, let's find out for sure if snd_una is
> > > surpassing high_seq while we're
From: Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:10:54 +0200
> * David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-30 14:43
> > Let's not speculate, let's find out for sure if snd_una is
> > surpassing high_seq while we're in this state.
> >
> > Andrew please give this debugging patch a spi
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:06:03 -0700
> > Andrew please give this debugging patch a spin,
>
> OK, will take a look at that this evening, hopefully.
BTW, Thomas Graf can also reproduce this and he is about
to post a log message from my patch.
> distccd see
* David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-30 14:43
> Let's not speculate, let's find out for sure if snd_una is
> surpassing high_seq while we're in this state.
>
> Andrew please give this debugging patch a spin, and also what
> is your workload? I'd like to play with it too.
>
> I've tried to
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Ilpo_J__rvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:33:28 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > If there is nothing at high_seq (application hasn't given any data to/past
> > that point), the search fails to find
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:33:28 +0300 (EEST)
> If there is nothing at high_seq (application hasn't given any data to/past
> that point), the search fails to find any skb and returns NULL... But I
> have no idea how this can happen? As TCP does after(skb-
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:33:28 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Full -mm lineup. The x86_64 box was acting as a distcc server at the time.
> >
> > Nothing hit the logs, I'm afraid. But almost all the info is in
> > http://
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Full -mm lineup. The x86_64 box was acting as a distcc server at the time.
>
> Nothing hit the logs, I'm afraid. But almost all the info is in
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/s5000494.jpg
>
>
>
> It died in tcp_update_scoreboard_fack() here:
>
>
Full -mm lineup. The x86_64 box was acting as a distcc server at the time.
Nothing hit the logs, I'm afraid. But almost all the info is in
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/s5000494.jpg
It died in tcp_update_scoreboard_fack() here:
if ((!IsFack(tp) || !tcp_skb_timedout(sk, sk
12 matches
Mail list logo
