Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>
>>That command is from a script that used to work with iproute2-ss020116
>>(2002!), which had the following in tc/m_police.c:
>>
>>210 } else if (strcmp(*argv, "action") == 0) {
>>211 NEXT_ARG();
>>212 if (get_police_r
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2007-07-18 11:49:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle
>>>0xfff fw police rate 1 burst 1 mpu 0 mtu 1 action drop
>>
>>It seems this is merely a parsing error, iproute doesn't have an
>>"action" p
At 2007-07-18 11:49:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle
> > 0xfff fw police rate 1 burst 1 mpu 0 mtu 1 action drop
>
> It seems this is merely a parsing error, iproute doesn't have an
> "action" parameter and aborts parsing
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Is it a bug that:
>
> # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 0xfff
> fw police rate 1 burst 1 mpu 0 mtu 1 action drop
> ^^^
> creates a filter that looks like:
>
> # tc filter ls
Hi.
Is it a bug that:
# tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 0xfff
fw police rate 1 burst 1 mpu 0 mtu 1 action drop
^^^
creates a filter that looks like:
# tc filter ls dev eth0
filter parent 1: protocol ip pref
