On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 03:53:01PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:58:11AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > if I read it correctly 9p actually responded with 8192 bytes of requests...
> > whereas the file size was 9624.
> > For large file sizes (in megabytes) the differenc
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:58:11AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> if I read it correctly 9p actually responded with 8192 bytes of requests...
> whereas the file size was 9624.
> For large file sizes (in megabytes) the difference between what
> sendfile is reporting and actual file size can be
gt; Hi Al,
> > > >
> > > > it seems the following commit 523ac9afc73a ("switch
> > > > default_file_splice_read() to use of pipe-backed iov_iter")
> > > > breaks sendfile from 9p fs into af_alg socket.
> > > > sendfile into af_alg
llowing commit 523ac9afc73a ("switch
> > > default_file_splice_read() to use of pipe-backed iov_iter")
> > > breaks sendfile from 9p fs into af_alg socket.
> > > sendfile into af_alg is used by iproute2/tc.
> > > I'm not sure whether it's 9p or crypto or vfs
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:46:26AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 07:58:29PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > it seems the following commit 523ac9afc73a ("switch
> > default_file_splice_read() to use of pipe-backed iov_iter&
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 07:58:29PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> it seems the following commit 523ac9afc73a ("switch
> default_file_splice_read() to use of pipe-backed iov_iter")
> breaks sendfile from 9p fs into af_alg socket.
> sendfile into af_alg i
Hi Al,
it seems the following commit 523ac9afc73a ("switch default_file_splice_read()
to use of pipe-backed iov_iter")
breaks sendfile from 9p fs into af_alg socket.
sendfile into af_alg is used by iproute2/tc.
I'm not sure whether it's 9p or crypto or vfs problem, but happy
