From: David Miller
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:45:20 -0800
>
> Yes, you will submit to me a patch to remove the unused code.
I should have paraphrased it better:
"I have the patch ready and will submit it when net-next opens again."
From: Shuah Khan
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:04:17 -0700
> On 01/20/2016 10:10 PM, Jεan Sacren wrote:
>> From: David Miller
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:36:28 -0500
>>>
>>> From: Julia Lawall
>>> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:54:20 +0100 (CET)
>>
>> [...]
>>
I just wondered. I was looking at
From: Jεan Sacren
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 22:10:56 -0700
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:36:28 -0500
>>
>> From: Julia Lawall
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:54:20 +0100 (CET)
>
> [...]
>
>> > I just wondered. I was looking at dependencies between networking files.
>> > This one
On 01/20/2016 10:10 PM, Jεan Sacren wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:36:28 -0500
>>
>> From: Julia Lawall
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:54:20 +0100 (CET)
>
> [...]
>
>>> I just wondered. I was looking at dependencies between networking files.
>>> This one stands out becau
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:36:28 -0500
>
> From: Julia Lawall
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:54:20 +0100 (CET)
[...]
> > I just wondered. I was looking at dependencies between networking files.
> > This one stands out because nothing is dependenton it, even the files it
> > is c