On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:30:02 +0100 Patrick McHardy wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:33:12 -0800
> >
> > I'm pretty sure we fixed that one already. Randy do you have some
> > objection to testing 2.6.20-final when discoving such
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:30:02 +0100
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:33:12 -0800
> >
> > I'm pretty sure we fixed that one already. Randy do you have some
> > objection to testing 2.6.20-fin
David Miller wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:33:12 -0800
>
> I'm pretty sure we fixed that one already. Randy do you have some
> objection to testing 2.6.20-final when discoving such bugs? :-)
Sorry for the confusion, we had an 8 months backlog of non
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:33:12 -0800
>
> (on 2.6.20-rc1-git8)
>
> It's possible to have
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=y
> and
> CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_IPV6HEADER=m,
>
> which causes this build error:
> net/built-in.o: In function `hashlimit_match':
> xt_hashlim
(on 2.6.20-rc1-git8)
It's possible to have
CONFIG_NETFILTER_XTABLES=y
and
CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_IPV6HEADER=m,
which causes this build error:
net/built-in.o: In function `hashlimit_match':
xt_hashlimit.c:(.text+0x1c887): undefined reference to `ipv6_find_hdr'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
Clea