On 12/14/2017 03:28 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
[...]
>> Arnaldo, will there be a rework of your fix that we could route to bpf tree?
>
> I'm resuming work on it after I get my current batch tested and
> submitted, will reboot with an older kernel and follow your suggestions,
> that seems
Em Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> [ +acme, +ast ]
>
> On 12/14/2017 10:16 AM, Eric Leblond wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems that the following patch did break libbpf (in net-next
> > version) which is not able to load anymore a program on a 4.14:
> >
> > tre
[ +acme, +ast ]
On 12/14/2017 10:16 AM, Eric Leblond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that the following patch did break libbpf (in net-next
> version) which is not able to load anymore a program on a 4.14:
>
> tree 5096ddd73981e33a2164606461a45b56a189889c
> parent ad5b177bd73f5107d97c36f56395c4281f
Hello,
It seems that the following patch did break libbpf (in net-next
version) which is not able to load anymore a program on a 4.14:
tree 5096ddd73981e33a2164606461a45b56a189889c
parent ad5b177bd73f5107d97c36f56395c4281fb6f089
author Martin KaFai Lau Wed Sep 27 14:37:54 2017 -0700
committer Da
